Citizens' Issues
Assam fixes new speed limits on national highways
People can now drive at 100 km per hour on four-laned divided carriageways on the national highways (NHs) in Assam, according to new speed limits fixed on Monday.
 
The public works department (building and national highways) has prescribed speed limits for all types of vehicles in the various stretches of national highways in the state, according to an official statement.
 
For national highway stretches on the plains with seven-metre carriageway without paved shoulders, the speed limit is 70 km per hour while for those with paved shoulders, it is 80 km per hour, the statement said.
 
"In four-lane divided carriageways, it is 100 km per hour, in curves and in developed areas in the above mentioned categories of NHs, it is 40 km per hour," it said.
 
"For those NHs in town areas, the speed limit is 40 km per hour, while NHs in congested town areas like Mirza, Chaygaon, Boko, Gauripur, Mangaldoi, Kharupetia, Banderdewa and Moran it is 20 km per hour, while in hill areas it is 40 km per hour."

User

BJP's land bill reversal, now for consent, social impact
In a major climbdown from its stated position, BJP appears to have agreed to restore key provisions of UPA's land law including those related to consent and social impact assessment (SIA), informed sources said.
 
The sources said that members of ruling National Democratic Alliance moved amendments at the Monday's meeting of the joint committee on land bill, seeking to bring back the consent clause and SIA.
 
The committee, headed by BJP's S.S. Ahluwalia, has sought time till August 7 to submit its report on the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Second Amendment Bill), 2015.
 
With the Bharatiya Janata Party having seemingly changed its position on the key bill, there is a possibility of the committee giving a consensus report and the government likely to recast the legislation.
 
The Congress and several other opposition parties had firmly objected to changes made in the land bill passed by the United Progressive Alliance government in 2013.
 
There was opposition to the bill from some Sangh outfits as also farmer organisations.
 
The Congress mounted a high-pitched attack on the Narendra Modi government on its new bill, alleging that it had made changes to the 2013 Act to benefit a few industralists.
 
The National Democratic Alliance government brought ordinances but the bill has not been passed by parliament. The bill was earlier passed by the Lok Sabha but could not be taken up in Rajya Sabha where the government lacks majority.
 
BJP leaders had repeatedly said that the UPA's land bill was against rural areas and they had made changes to the bill after suggestions from the states.
 
Prime Minister Narendra Modi had also convened a meeting with states on the bill last month which was boycotted by the Congress.
 
The 2013 Act required that the consent of 80 percent of land owners is obtained for private projects and that the consent of 70 percent of land owners be obtained for public private partnership (PPP) projects.
 
The bill of the NDA government exempted five categories - defence, rural infrastructure, affordable housing, industrial corridors and infrastructure projects including PPP projects where the central government owns the land - from these provisions of the act. 
 
While the 2013 act was applicable for the acquisition of land for private companies, the new bill proposed changed this to acquisition for "private entities" or an entity ther than a government entity, and could include a proprietorship, partnership, company, corporation, non-profit organization, or other entity under any other law.

User

COMMENTS

Meenal Mamdani

1 year ago

This is what happens when hubris reigns in the ruling party. Modi govt should have anticipated this push back from the opposition and kept this controversial bill for another year while shepherding more important bills like the GST bill through the parliament. For a party that won a landslide, BJP seems to be tone deaf to the realities on the ground.

Delhi government spent Rs.22.33 crore on ads, HC told
The Delhi government on Monday told the Delhi High Court that since the May 13 order of the Supreme Court ruling that taxpayers' money cannot be spent to build the image of political leaders, it has spent Rs.22.33 crore on advertisements related to its policies.
 
Filing an affidavit before a division bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath, Delhi government counsel Raman Duggal denied the allegation that huge amounts were being spent on advertisements glorifying Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Aarty (AAP).
 
The government said it was spending Rs.8 crore per month on advertisements to spread "awareness about government policies, programmes, activities, achievements, services and initiatives amongst the public since the public has a right to such information".
 
The bench had earlier asked the Kejriwal government to file a status report with details of money spent by it on advertisements following the Supreme Court direction.
 
The affidavit of the Delhi government said the total budget for Delhi was Rs.40,000 crore, out of which Rs.523 crore was earmarked for information and publicity -- which comes to 1.518 percent.
 
From the date of the Supreme Court judgement, a sum of Rs.22,33,24,659 has been spent on print, electronic media as well as outdoor publicity, which works out to approximately Rs.8 crore per month, which was a "very meagre amount" compared to the budget of Rs.523 crore.
 
The city government's response came on a bunch of PILs, including a plea by Congress leader Ajay Maken, seeking restraint on advertisements allegedly glorifying Kejriwal and the AAP.
 
Maken, who heads the Delhi unit of the Congress, also sought direction to restrain the Delhi government from publishing Kejriwal's name in any of its current or future advertisements.
 
The plea said the act of the government was contrary to the ruling of the Supreme Court which called the development of personality cult of political functionaries at the cost of public money as an "antithesis to democracy".
 
The court posted the matter for August 5.
 
Meanwhile, another bench of the high court also sought the Delhi government's response on a similar plea by August 6.

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)