During the entire 2010-11 fiscal, the company had sold 22.43 million sq ft for Rs2,392.7 crore
Realty firm Ansal Properties and Infrastructure said it has sold 9.54 million sq ft of area for Rs1,138 crore during the first four months of the current fiscal.
During the entire 2010-11 fiscal, the company had sold 22.43 million sq ft for Rs2,392.7 crore. "Total area sold in four months ended FY2012 increased to
9.54 million sq ft, aggregating to total sale value of Rs1,138.1 crore," Ansal said in latest operational updates.
The average realisation stood at Rs1,433 per sq ft in July 2011 against Rs1,404 a sq ft in the previous month. "Major sales booked in Phase I and Phase II of Sushant Golf City, Lucknow during the month (July)," the company said.
Ansal had recently reported a nearly 44% decline in consolidated net profit at Rs21.74 crore for the quarter ended 30 June due to higher expenditure on construction. The company had posted a net profit of Rs38.79 crore in the year-ago period.
The total income, however, increased by 16.42% to Rs297.01 crore in the first quarter of this fiscal against Rs255.12 crore in the corresponding period of last fiscal. Ansal's total expenditure grew to Rs245.17 crore during the June quarter of 2011-12 fiscal from Rs182.98 crore in the year-ago period.
On Wednesday, Ansal Properties ended 6.49% down at Rs28.10 on the Bombay Stock Exchange, while the benchmark Sensex gained 0.66% to 16,840.80.
The fall in the wholesale numbers is due to lower demand for Tata passenger cars
Tata Motors group global sales, including Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), fell 6% to 85,392 units in July. The fall in the wholesale numbers is due to lower demand for Tata passenger cars, as well as Fiat and Jaguar.
The global sales of Tata passenger vehicles and the distribution off-take in India of Fiat cars were down by 38% in July at 19,035 units for the month on a year-on-year basis. Jaguar sales for the month fell 23% to 4,372 units on a year-on-year basis.
Overall passenger vehicle (PV) sales of Tata Motors in India too declined in June quarter by 11%. This includes Fiat and JLR vehicles distributed in India.
The company's global commercial vehicle range including Tata, Tata Daewoo and the Tata Hispano Carrocera vehicles grew by 16% to 47,238 units in July on a year-on-year basis. Even Land Rover brand standalone continued its growth in July with wholesales at 14,747 units, higher by 8%.
During the period extending between April to July, Tata Motors global wholesales grew by 4% to 350,565 compared to the corresponding period in 2010-11.
On Wednesday, Tata Motors ended 2.8% down at Rs779.30 on the Bombay Stock Exchange, while the benchmark Sensex gained 0.66% to 16,840.80.
SEBI’s consent orders are seen as a quick escape mechanism for anyone who is caught violating market regulations and the amount paid would depend on the skills of the lawyer who negotiates the settlement
Market regulator the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has again let off Stewart & Mackertich Wealth Management, earlier known as SMIFS Securities with a fine of Rs2.5 crore in the DSQ Software case. However, this is not the first time that the market regulator has allowed the company to get off the hook through consent orders.
The latest order on 18th July, issued by Dr KM Abraham and Prashant Saran, both whole-time members of SEBI, says, "The investigation prima facie revealed that SMIFS Securities had executed 47 synchronised transactions on behalf of promoter associated entities of DSQ Software Ltd. Therefore, it was alleged that the applicant created artificial volume in the scrip, thereby violating the provisions of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2005, SEBI (Stock Brokers & Sub-brokers) Regulations, 1992, and the provisions of SEBI SMD circular no SMDRP/POLICY/Cir-32/99 dated September 14, 1999."
Following the investigation, SEBI initiated an inquiry and issued a show-cause notice to SMIFS Securities on 13 September 2006. While the proceedings were in progress, on 4 September 2007, SMIFS Securities submitted a proposal for settlement under terms of a SEBI circular issued on 20 April 2007. However, on 12 March 2009, SEBI rejected the settlement proposal.
SMIFS Securities submitted a revised proposal on 12 October 2010 and showed willingness to pay a fine of Rs2.5 crore. The high powered advisory committee constituted by SEBI considered the consent terms proposed by SMIFS Securities and recommended to accept the settlement on payment of Rs2.5 crore. On 4 July 2011, SMIFS Securities remitted Rs2.5 crore towards settlement, without admitting or denying the charges and SEBI disposed off the pending inquiry proceedings.
SMIFS Securities was allowed to also get away in 2008 with payment of a fine of a mere Rs3 lakh, on charges of dealing with unregistered sub-brokers, failing to segregate clients' funds and securities and failing to maintain a database of its clients.
In 2004, the market regulator twice rejected the applications of Wealth Management Advisory Services (WMAS) for a portfolio manager licence after it found SMIFS Securities, SMIFS Capital Markets and SMIFS Capital Services were associates of WMAS. "As a capital market regulator, SEBI cannot ignore the connections the applicant company has with the persons who indulged in manipulation in the market," TM Nagarajan, a then whole-time member of SEBI, had said.
The same year, SEBI also rejected SMIFS' application for registration as a merchant banker. In an order issued on 6 August 2004, Mr Nagarajan, said, "An intermediary in the securities market plays an important role and hence if the intermediary is not a fit and proper person, it may act to the detriment of the interest of the investors. In view of the pending proceedings against the associates of the applicant, it is felt that grant of certificate of registration to the applicant company to act as a merchant banker may prove to be detrimental to the interest of the investors."
Earlier this year, in what was perhaps the biggest settlement through a consent order, the market regulator barred Anil Ambani, chairman of the Anil Dhirubhai Ambani group (ADAG), and four of its directors from investing in the markets till December 2011. SEBI also asked Anil Dhirubhai Ambani group companies Reliance Infrastructure (RelInfra) and Reliance Natural Resources (RNRL), which were merged with Reliance Power (RelPower), not to invest in the secondary markets-other than mutual funds-till December 2012.
The market regulator settled the matter with these ADAG companies after the Anil Ambani group, RelInfra, RNRL and its directors collectively paid Rs50 crore as the settlement amount. The case involved a probe into certain market "dealings" by the two ADAG companies, RelInfra and RNRL.
According to Watchoutinvestors.com, a site sponsored and aided by Investor Education and Protection Fund, in the period from 30 October 2001 to 12 August 2011, SEBI has reached a settlement, or passed a consent order for cases involving 538 companies.
You may also want to read…