AMFI chief admits industry is in for a rough ride

HN Sinor, chief executive of mutual fund body AMFI, feels that the industry will go through a rough patch for at least six more months

Now that the finance ministry has granted the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) regulatory supervision over Unit-linked Insurance Plans (ULIPs), participants in the mutual fund industry are a worried lot. HN Sinor, chief executive of the Association of Mutual Funds in India, in a candid interview with Moneylife, admitted the consequences of this decision on the mutual fund industry. "It is very clear now that it is a law, as an ordinance has been passed. So there is no question of dispute on this. I believe that we may go through a rough patch for the next six months, because distributors would prefer to distribute insurance products, wherein the commission structure is quite different from the mutual fund products. So naturally, distributors will ask why they should sell something where they are not earning anything."

Capital market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had abolished the entry load on mutual funds in August last year and attempted to regulate ULIPs earlier this year. However, the finance and law ministries passed on ordinance that has stopped SEBI in its tracks and granted IRDA powers to continue to regulate ULIPs.

Mr Sinor expressed the hope that, in the meantime, the insurance regulator would further tighten the commission structure to bring in an alignment with the system.

Already, IRDA has made several attempts at revamping the product structure by introducing cap on surrender charges and mandating a certain amount of life cover on all ULIP products.

Speaking about the entry load ban on the occasion of a recent industry summit, Mr Sinor had said, "Commission payouts are an integral part of this industry. A fresh review is needed in this regard. Such attempts (at regulatory change) could disturb the industry." Responding to a question whether SEBI will be open to rethinking on the matter, he said, "That was a proposal which we made yesterday.

But if I heard Mr Bhave correctly, it would be difficult for them to review this. Anyway, our job is to keep on trying and their job is to see what is best for the investors."

Commenting on the proposals in the revised paper of the Direct Tax Code that suggests introducing long-term capital gains tax on equity-linked instruments, Mr Sinor pointed out that AMFI was reviewing the matter and that it would make suggestions to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). "The major issue is, if certain long-term investments are in EEE (Exempt-Exempt-Exempt) category, then benefits should also flow to small investors in mutual funds. If it were stated that there would be no exemption hereafter for anything, then I can understand that it cuts across everybody. But if it is available for one financial product and not for another, then it is not proper."

(Look out for a detailed interview with the AMFI chief on Monday, 28th June)




6 years ago

why is it dificult for SEBI to review its decision?

Mr Bhave's work is to Save and grow MF industry and not to save and grow his own ego.

It seems that Mr Bhave is saving and growing his own ego at the cost of MF industry.

Ranjan D Gupta

6 years ago

SEBI had taken an abrupt decision to cut entry load without giving much serious thought to the consequences.Apparently it gives a sense of comfort to the investors that there is no entry load on their investment. But because of apathy of the distributors Mutual Fund Industry is suffering from lack of fund,this in turn restrict them to invest more money when the market comes down to a point when further investment is required to boost performance of the scheme and such a condition draging down the scheme - performances.Therefore an inference can be drawn that ultimately investors are not gaining anything from "No entry load" system rather they are losing more due to deterioration in fund performances.

jignesh n vyas

6 years ago

If you improvr invesment in mf and also business in rulear india you first start up-fron commission to advisor. sebi all ready fail and damage of mf. you have re thinking of antry load ben.

T D Joshi

6 years ago

Start paying up-front commissions to Mutual Fund Agents / Didtributors.This shall improve sales of MFs.

Dillip kumar swain

6 years ago

Actually sebi failed to provide protection to investors. ulip is never transparent like mutual funds. finance minister has no experience in buying ulip.he will also not qualify to buy.irda play the game by enhancing 10 times coverage of annual premium.mortality charges will eat the customers premium on rising trend every is difficult to pay minimum return to policy holders by LI companies.So policyholders be cautious to buy ULIPS FROM L.I. COMPANIES.BUY TERM PLAN OR M.F.'S ULIP.

Govt issues LoIs to 3G bidders; to allot spectrum on 1st September

Operators are expected to launch their 3G services in the first quarter of next year

The government today said it would allot third generation (3G) spectrum to successful bidders on 1st September, and rejected the criticism of faulty auction process leading to high prices by leading operators, reports PTI.

The government also said that the Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) spectrum would be allocated to all the players, including Infotel Broadband, which has been acquired by Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries (RIL), next week.

"While the overall proceeds from the auction for 3G and BWA spectrum at over Rs1,06,000 crore have exceeded all expectations, an equally important aspect is that the true market value of the spectrum was determined through an efficient and transparent process," telecom secretary P J Thomas told reporters in New Delhi.

The country's largest mobile operator Bharti Airtel, which had won 13 out of 22 3G circles, had criticised the auction process and had said, "We would like to point out that the auction format and severe spectrum shortage, along with ensuing policy uncertainty, drove the prices beyond reasonable levels. As a result, we could not achieve our objective of pan-Indian 3G footprint in this round."

Similarly in case of BWA spectrum auction, the company had pointed out, "A combination of scarcity of slots and the auction format, once again, resulted in extremely high price levels."

Other operators, including Vodafone, had also echoed views and had pulled out of the auction mid way citing irrational bidding.

Anil Ambani group firm Reliance Communications (RCom) and Bharti had won 3G spectrum in 13 circles each along with others. These players would be getting the frequency on 1st September this year and one can expect the third generation mobile services in the first quarter of next year.

Mr Thomas said the revenues earned from sale of spectrum for both 3G and BWA are more than three times the target of Rs35,000 crore, fixed by the ministry of finance in the budget, and more than five times the reserve prices.

On the issue of RIL buying Infotel Broadband, which won BWA spectrum in all India, the government said, "The spectrum cannot be sold but as far as change of ownership is concerned it is permitted.


Caveat Emptor

‘Investor beware’ is the ruling dictum of the capital market. So investors are expected to...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)