Citizens' Issues
Allow registration of FIR as a matter of right

Time is ripe now to unleash equivalent of RTI in policing; to make FIR registration a matter of right. The police should have no discretion to refuse FIR registration. In fact, a recorded FIR helps make people as accountable as the police simply because a record exists

Public silence and tolerance limits just got breached. The last straw was the Delhi gang-rape but the scourge on the society was always there and is continuing still. And continuing also is the debate on laws, policing, men, women, society, change and more. Amongst the deafening cacophony, screeching anchors and plethora of opinions from almost everyone, it seems justice JS Verma’s quest for suggestions has very quickly become from elusive answers to one of information overload, with no shortage of views. My case is simple—do first things first, build a rock-solid foundation and rest will follow. And, best things often are simple too. That the suggestion made herein is the generic covering all criminal/civil cases; it strengthens the case even more.

 

The suggested first step in restoring the faith of people in criminal justice system is to make FIR (first information report) registration free for all citizens.

 

Rahul Gandhi asked for concrete suggestions to end violence against women and if he has the powers many attribute to him and prompting him to seek suggestions to change the status quo, he could start with a game-changer like this. And what we are asking for is just a full, fair and free implementation of the existing law on FIR registration in letter and spirit, freeing it up from discretion, something that should be so in the first place. Right to FIR.

 

The most forceful public voice on police reforms, Kiran Bedi, placed the issue on top of the agenda in the aftermath of the heinous crime and we explore the what, how and why it is uppermost in priority, how it can be done and what stops.

 

Why free FIR first?

 

The criminal justice system in India starts from and rests on lodging of a complaint by a victim (or even others for that matter) of a crime, with the police. As we all possibly learnt in secondary school civics, FIR is the first step in sharing information with the police, triggering actions by the police, law and administrative machinery of the state. We all assume it to be what it literally means—it is first, it is information and it is a formally recorded report. It is not a charge-sheet, it is not even an allegation. It is just information that may lead to further steps based on investigation. But anyone who has ever attempted to lodge an FIR knows how that is easier said than done. Yes, law permits even a third party, for example, a witness to lodge the report but we all know even victims are either scared of entering a police station or denied FIR registration, what to say of third parties.

 

A colleague in a metropolitan city was mercilessly assaulted and thrown out of the house at midnight by her husband. After some frantic calls to relatives and unable to cool tempers, she was advised to lodge a police complaint. Luckily the police station was nearby but she did not feel safe to go alone at the late hour and waited for her relatives to come. Later, the police constable on duty heard her but refused to make any case, instead, seeking to meet the husband. Then another round of meetings with the SHO followed. To cut the long story short—over next few days, after multiple trips by the woman and her relatives and the husband playing truant, the police started convincing the woman to make up to the husband, refused to lodge complaint and even brokered peace between both and asked husband to take the wife back. No FIR, no complaint was registered.

 

A month later, an action replay happened. Again the police refused to register any complaint. After few weeks, through a lawyer and intervention of courts, under Section 156 (3) of the CrPC, an FIR was filed. The colleague shared that the police did not cooperate even then and merely said they would file what they wish to in the court, where they diluted her case on possible receipt of bribes. By the time the FIR was filed only two months after second assault on her, all chance of police action and gathering evidence was lost.

 

This is no isolated case. Only cases involving serious crimes like murder or rape, or those involving the powerful elite or on orders from higher authorities, or on orders of the court, get registered. A last category of FIRs getting registered is often through bribes. The problem in this sequence of events that plays out with minor variations in any criminal case, big or small is that lodging a FIR is not free. The whole process is to discourage registration of crime. This leads to police being deprived of crime intelligence as also the victim being deprived of right to complain. And worse, it emboldens the culprits. Moreover, any discretion, as with the police on the subject, is source of extra power and prone to misuse. Thirdly, anything unrecorded in the police registers is as good as not having happened. Fourthly, why does the police fail to register a FIR in the first place and has to be told by courts? Any case admitted and sent to the police for registering a FIR under Section 156 (3) should be taken as a corrective advice from the judiciary to the police to prevent similar errors in future but it is not even perceived that way by the police and taken as a norm.

 

Why I also push for FIR registration above many other reforms is because they would be supported by it. And many reforms would give a fake picture if the base is still weak in form of unreliable crime records due to lack of FIR registration.

 

What is the big deal in free FIR first?

 

“Our crime record on rape is high because registration has gone up,” we all heard the joint commissioner of police say in defence of Delhi’s crime record. Conversely, a state like Uttar Pradesh, despite being low on women safety and law and order, also gets away by showing its low official crime rate. The point is, the entire crime record data is either worth using or we should not even spend in recording/documenting it. If registration is low then also the police should be accountable and if crime is high, then too. Today it is the opposite. The police gets away with high crime rate in a region saying registration is high and police also gets away with high rates of unregistered by quoting official figures. This is a key argument in separating the wheat from the chaff, to point where the fault in system is.

 

Youth is exposed to SLAs, KRAs, deadlines, timelines, budgets and performance-linked bonuses. They are used to customer service with assured service levels and see themselves as customers of the police in regard to law and order. Saada haq aethe rakh generation is here. Gone are the mai-baap days of the government. Bureaucratic control and the desire to retain government service superseded any desire to complain against the system. Not any more as not any more government jobs as well.

 

Once complete and faithfully recorded, the FIR log is available for all complaints, one can compare police stations’ performance or compare one SHO with his predecessor. It is not rocket science to build in checks in the system against frivolous complaints. We had similar complaints against RTI (Right to Information) but the system stabilizes rather quick. Only voices dissenting on RTI are those whose unbridled power has come under check.

 

Moreover, any professional knows that availability of good data leads to good decisions. One police station that excels in controlling crime can then share experiences as model for others. Best practices shared like this is not possible without objective fact-driven and data-based system of decision making. Laggards can be identified. Resources can be optimized. Disconnect with people’s aspirations can come to the fore. NCRB (National Crime Records Bureau) publishes data every year. Once the data is reliable, politicians, local leaders, common man can all seek answers and drive police conduct, priorities and resources.

 

The police can benefit from such clear records by assessing their resources, align its performance and focus on real metrics. It will help the police counter any false propaganda and have credibility. This is bedrock of police reforms. All actions, resources, performance appraisals, promotions, recruitment—all get aligned correctly if results are true to public expectations. It is no different from the citizen’s charter, or a corporate service center with committed service levels.

 

In the next part I will discuss how the right of FIR actually works.

 

(Sandeep Khurana is an independent consultant and researcher. Views expressed are personal. He can be reached at his twitter Id @IQnEQ.)

User

COMMENTS

Nitin Sharma

4 years ago

Sir, Excellent article! Eagerly waiting for the next part ....how it actually works. And also, how to ensure implementation and accountability of the police.
Warm Regards.

SuchindranathAiyerS

4 years ago

Registration of FIR IS already a matter of right as also a duty, and like so many other rights is denied to the citizen by India's ruling scum.

Arjun Raghunath Dongare

4 years ago

There are guidelines issued by Supreme Court & various High Courts regarding filing of FIR.But no one ever cares to follow them in letter & spirit.
Whenever a person approaches a lower court to file a private FIR, the court should first ask to police "Whether they have followed the guidelines issued by Supreme Court & High Court?" & if not why?
I THINK THE BEST SOLUTION REMAINS ONLINE FIR SYSTEM.

Vaibhav Dhoka

4 years ago

Yes in India generally FIR is filed at a COST.Only powerful politicians enjoy it ALL FREE.In case of complaint against Kotak Securities Ltd Pune police made me to appear more than 100 times to tell that NO FIR(Due to Kotak officials managed them)During same periods more than 20 FIRs were lodged in cheating and frauds in securities were filed by Pune police.Till we make system of ACCOUNTABILITY mandatory we cannot expect change in system.The commission of inquiry here are to kill public voice.If one goes to find date about commission of inquiry it is MOST DISMAL.General belief is they are to cushion post retirement for SC/HC judges.So FIR must be CIVIL RIGHT.

MOHAN

4 years ago

excellent article.

Moneylife Foundation Event Update: UID/Aadhaar: Can fingerprints be faked?

Moneylife Foundation, UID, Aadhaar, event, UIDAI, government, poor, forensic, fingerprints, FevicolJT D’souza, who has been trained at Canon, Japan, on design of computerised test systems for facsimile and photocopiers, showed how fingerprints can be faked at the Moneylife Foundation seminar on 12 January 2013


At the Moneylife Foundation seminar conducted at Royal Bombay Yacht Club, Jude Terrence D’souza, a Mumbai-based forensic expert, showed to the full house of audience on how UID/Aadhaar can be undermined by faking of fingerprints. Mr D’souza showed a demo on how pre-spoofed prints made from wax and Fevicol can be accepted as valid fingerprints. After watching the demo, audience must have wondered if the entire UID project is a non-starter.
 
According to Mr D’souza, it is extremely easy to forge fingerprints and fool biometric devices. By their very nature, convergence creates an automatic privacy subverting infrastructure and concentrates power in the hands of those controlling the technology. Mr D’souza says that the UIDAI has not only multiplied this danger, but unknowingly introduced massive vulnerabilities in the processes of creating and establishing identity. Earlier in the session, he gave a short introduction to fingerprint and iris biometrics. He explained the intrinsic and extrinsic flaws inherent in biometrics.
 
During the first session, Col (retd) Mathew Thomas explained the effort to promote “cash transfers” using UID/Aadhaar and what this means to the bank customers. UID/Aadhaar is a scheme promoted to eliminate corruption in welfare schemes so that the poor have access to welfare, but Col Thomas exposed some of the more pernicious side of the UID scheme along with the deceit in the utterances and actions of UIDAI and the Government.
 
The UK government had scrapped the National ID Card Act of that country. They have the problems of terrorism and illegal immigration, for which the Blair government thought that a biometric national ID card system was the answer. They passed the Act, appointed contractors and went ahead. The new government scrapped the Act and the project. In doing so, the UK government said, “We propose to do government business as servants of the people, not their masters”. 

User

COMMENTS

Nikita

4 years ago

Gives me yet another reason to not apply for this card. I hope I'm not forced to apply for it as the government I believe has already made it compulsory now. Probably, the whole system will fail by the time I make up my mind to go for it!

Ram Das

4 years ago

I noticed that Moneylife deleted Mukesh Kamath comment soon after it was posted. Mr. Kamath provided counterpoints and factual evidence as rebuttal to Thomas' views. There was nothing offensive, inaccurate or derogative to Mr. Kamath's comments. There is no point in posting comments if Money life can not respect basic right of the readers.
lease put back Mr. Kamath's comment.

REPLY

Mathew Thomas

In Reply to Ram Das 4 years ago

I have replied at length to Mukesh Kamath's posting. Please read that. 'Money Life' has bot "removed" it, as you allege. If your aim was to sling mud, hoping some of it will stick, that is a forlorn hope.

Sucheta Dalal

In Reply to Ram Das 4 years ago

You are so dubious. You reveal the fact that you are working with UIDAI contractors and clearly colluding with whoever Mukesh Kamath is. Why dont you check the correct article before making vile and dubious allegations.

Nothing exposes your motives more than this. So please find some other place to post your tainted views. Certainly not required on Moneylife.

Sucheta Dalal

In Reply to Ram Das 4 years ago

You are so dubious. You reveal the fact that you are working with UIDAI contractors and clearly colluding with whoever Mukesh Kamath is. Why dont you check the correct article before making vile and dubious allegations.

Nothing exposes your motives more than this. So please find some other place to post your tainted views. Certainly not required on Moneylife.

240p FLV

In Reply to Sucheta Dalal 4 years ago

These Aadhar people are bunch of paranoid lunatics. As usual wrong. But then:
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his income depends upon his not understanding it!" - Upton Sinclair

Moneylife Foundation’s seminar on UID/Aadhaar, a medicine possibly worse than the disease

The Aadhaar project was supposed to eliminate corruption in welfare schemes and provide the...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)