Ajit Pawar’s Rs70,000 crore uri'nation’

Ajit Pawar, in a shocking statement asked if he was expected to fill empty dams by urinating in them. While party workers laughed and applauded, the junior Pawar seems to have forgotten that his government spent over Rs70,000 crore for increasing the irrigation potential in Maharashtra by a mere 0.1% in one of the biggest scandals in the state

Ajit Pawar, nephew of Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) chief Sharad Pawar and deputy chief minister of Maharashtra has provoked national outrage with his insane humour regarding the lack of water for drought-hit farmers. While Ajit Pawar has issued an apology, it does not mitigate the damage already done. The question is, how can the deputy CM make such a thoughtless remark when he himself was at the helm of affairs in the irrigation department for over 10 years while the government spent over Rs70,000 crore to increase the state’s irrigation potential by mere 0.1%?


The insane remark has even forced the NCP chief to tender an apology on behalf of his deputy CM—strangely enough on social media, which allows only 149 characters to express regret. Sharad Pawar, on twitter, said, “I duly apologise on the behalf of Deputy CM of Maharashtra for the unwanted comment that he had made.” However, this is not the first time, the NCP chief has to apologise for his nephew. But more about it later.


On Saturday, while speaking at a public function at Nimboli near Indapur, the junior Pawar, had said, “There is this person, Deshmukh from Solapur, who is on hunger strike for 55 days demanding to release water from Ujani dam. When there is no water in the dam, from where we are going to release (the water)? Should we urinate?”


The person, Ajit Pawar referred in his speech is Bhaisaheb Deshmukh from Solapur who is sitting on protest for over 55 days at Azad Maidan in Mumbai demanding release of water from Ujani dam for the nearby villages.


Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has alleged that while villagers are denied water from the Ujani dam, the same is being provided to Dynamix Dairy, a company owned by a family considered close to Sharad Pawar, and to sugar mills controlled by leaders from the NCP and Congress.


Ujani dam, created by the 185 ft high earth-cum-concrete gravity dam on the Bhima river in Solapur district has an annual utilisation capacity of 580 cubic metre (cu mi) with a catchment area of 14,850 sq km. Water supplied from the reservoir for irrigation in agricultural areas was primarily aimed at reducing incidence of famines and scarcity during drought conditions. However, due to political interference and increased water supply to sugar mills, the conditions have become adverse leaving lakhs of people without drinking water.


The primary reason for acute water shortage is increased cultivation of sugar cane, especially in drought-affected areas. On an average, sugar cane requires 1.8 lakh litres of water per acre for one crop cycle. Similarly, sugar mills need 354.34 cu mi of water from crushing 1,000 metric tonnes of sugar cane.


The catchment area of Ujani dam witnesses an average rainfall of 700 mm per year, which is more suitable for crops like jowar (millet) and groundnut. The storage created by the Ujani Dam has resulted in the irrigation of 500 sq km, particularly in Solapur district, resulting in doubling the yield of jowar and tripling the yield of groundnut.


However, due to the increase in number of sugar mills in the region, especially those set up by politicians, this picture has now changed. Out of the total 160 sugar mills in Maharashtra, there are 16 mills in Pune district and 18 in Solapur district and almost all of them are related with or controlled by politicians, especially from the NCP and Congress, both ruling parties in the state.


Coming back to Ajit Pawar's crass speech, it did not stop with urinating for water—he also linked the growing population to increased copulation due to power shortages and load shedding. He said, “I have also come to know that since there is load shedding (power cuts) in the state, the population is increasing. Due to lack of electricity, people have nothing else to do.”


However, after nationwide horror and outrage at the insensitivity of the remarks and strident calls for his resignation, Ajit Pawar tendered an apology. In a statement issued on Sunday evening, he said, “The statement… was not about the drought-affected people, but if I have hurt the feelings of people, I apologise with humility.”


Opposition parties criticised Ajit Pawar’s comments. While the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) demanded his resignation, Uddhav Thackeray, chief of the Shiv Sena, asked Sharad Pawar and Maharashtra chief minister Prithviraj Chavan to remove the junior Pawar from the state Cabinet.


Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray, while speaking in a public meeting at Jalgaon, said, “How can the deputy chief minister use such dirty language about the people of this state? When people are suffering in drought, he had no shame in showing any responsibility and instead is using such a foul language.”


In a statement, AAP, said, “His (Ajit Pawar’s) statements show his true face…a corrupt politician who has no empathy for the citizens and to have such a man at a leadership role in disaster for the state. What is even more shocking is that his statements were met with laughter from the NCP spectators. After holding the irrigation portfolio and spending Rs77,000 crore, he dares to ask where should he get the water from?”


The irrigation scam

Last September, the Economic Survey made an observation stating that though Rs70,000 crore had been spent on various projects during the last decade, Maharashtra's irrigation potential had increased by just 0.1%. Interestingly, the irrigation portfolio (now known as water resources ministry) has been held by the NCP since 1999, by Ajit Pawar till 2009 and after that by Sunil Tatkare, a close associate of the junior Pawar.


The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) had already begun a probe into the decisions taken by the irrigation ministry during that period.


Earlier in February 2012, Vijay Pandhare, chief engineer from the irrigation department and a member of the state level technical advisory committee, wrote a letter to authorities pointing out the gross irregularities. In an explanatory letter in May, Pandhare pointed out that Rs12,000 crore spent on lift irrigation projects in the state are a total waste as around 99% of the total 227 projects in Maharashtra are not working and 90% never began functioning.


In 2009, 32 irrigation projects worth Rs20,000 to Rs25,000 crore were cleared by Ajit Pawar, the then irrigation minister of Maharashtra allegedly without following the procedures. Clearances to projects include Krishna Valley Development Corp in Western Maharashtra with seven dams. The cost of 38 projects in Vidarbha were increased by 300% between June and August.


In Vidarbha, where much of the exposed irregularities lie, the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation undertook some 320 projects since 1997. However, actual increase in irrigated area till March 2011 has been just 26,000 hectares (ha) against the targeted 1.58 million ha, according to the state water resources department.


In Vidarbha, the cost of the Gosekhurd project, the largest in Maharashtra, increased at the rate of Rs1.19 crore per day. It shot up 36.52 times in 29 years to Rs13,596 crore. The cost of the Lower Painganga project in Yavatmal district also escalated at a rate of Rs1.9 crore per day. In Washim district, also the cost of 11 barrages went up to Rs40-Rs50 crore each in 2009 from an estimated cost of Rs7-Rs8 crore a year ago.


AAP founder Arvind Kejriwal has alleged that business interests of Nitin Gadkari, former president of BJP, were hurting interests of farmers in Vidarbha region. Alleging a nexus between Ajit Pawar and Gadkari, the AAP founder said, the then BJP president sought and secured 37 ha land that was acquired by Maharashtra government for a dam but not used. The land was allotted by Ajit Pawar, who was the irrigation minister then, Kejriwal said.


The controversy raised by communications send by Pandhare caused Ajit Pawar to resign as deputy chief minister in September 2012. However, within few months, he was back in the cabinet as deputy chief minister.


Apologies from Sharad Pawar

Earlier also NCP chief Sharad Pawar had tendered an apology over Ajit Pawar’s allegedly use of abusive language about journalists. “As party chief, I won’t have qualms about offering a public apology. Here, if language of force has been used, I have no problem in (tendering) apology,” he had said.


In February 2011, while speaking at a function in Nanded district, Ajit Pawar had accused journalist of fabricating stories and criticised media for allegedly indulging in untruths and half-truths and suggested a gag on those indulging in such methods, which led to the controversy. This led to media boycotting coverage of functions including Ajit Pawar and Maharashtra CM Chavan.



Ashok Kumar Rastogi

4 years ago

Policticans are there where ever crony capital exist. NCP is news for corruption whether it is real estate or irrigation are water theft.


4 years ago

All States in South India are Constructing Dams at Huge Price Escalations/Cost overruns,eventhough Water is not There for Existing Dams also and Unable to Release Water therefrom for Drinking/ Farming Purposes and Fights agist neighbour Sates for Water Release/ Not Increasing Dam's Heights. Cetre Has to LINK all Rivers in India , so that Surplus Water In Northern India is not Wasted into Seas.Within the Amount Spent by all States on Dams ,Linkage of all RIVERS can easily be Done.


Ubaldo C DSouza

In Reply to NSriramamurty 4 years ago

Mr. Sriramamurty: You think they do not know all that you have said? And if they took it all into account, how would they loot the national and state coffers? But it is the brazen insolence that hurts.


4 years ago


Ubaldo C DSouza

4 years ago

Only nepotism in the Maratha satraps stable could have spawned insolent progeny capable of such thought and language. If I could match his language, I would have told him where to pee!

jaideep shirali

4 years ago

The framers of our Constitution gave the legislatures and bureaucracy so much unchecked power, that the citizens are now reduced to onlookers without any effective form of protest. The Pawars deserve the curses of not just every drought affected, but every resident of the state. As for the legislatures as a whole, the recent Mumbai episode shows us the law-makers in their true light and the pride of the legislature, whatever that now means.

Sai Gopal

4 years ago

Good article

Vineeth A Kumar

4 years ago

that's what i call a scam, with each breaking scam news almost everyday from 1st Jan 2013 - with ZERO prosecution, i feel the judicial community is in love with scam makers. the paid media has already been found to share a room love-hate relationship.

there is only one option for a 21st Century product - JOIN THE SCAM...all the others will be in love with you...crap...!

are there any investigative journalists out there to expose an industry, which has sucked the blood of common man for 60 plus years..i can give you tangible proofs...if you have the "GUTS"come forward...rather than posting a flash news in the name of journalism. anybody out there to take it to the end...leave a message, i will contact you...



In Reply to Vineeth A Kumar 4 years ago

Yours Statement is Unbelievable.Now Courts are taking up such Cases SUO MOTO also. If you have Proof,you can simply write a latter to High Court Cheief Justice ,Requesting it be taken as PIL and HCs happily allows them and ask CBI to investigate.HC also is asking CBI,if it does not do its Work Properly,threatening them on Contempt of Court.For Every Indian Getting Proof is only Highly Difficult task,Preventing them from filing PILs.After Anna Hajare's Movement Last year and CAG bringing out many Scams,ofcourse which are Closed simply by Politicians in their Selfish Skin Saving efforts,Many Educated Indians Blood is Boiling at things Happenings.In AP,simply a Letter to HC by Mr.Shankar Rao's has Opened Pandora Box and Many IAS/IPS Officers,Ministers are going Behind Bars in Quid PRO Quo case agaist Mr.Jagan Mohan Reddy.
So Kindly Write a Letter to Concerned States HC or put them Here,so that Other Indians will Take up.Mr.Arun Kejrival is Lamenting for not able to get Proof for Scams Brought out By Him.

Do not underestimate women power says Narendra Modi at FICCI meet

Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi, at the women’s wing AGM of FICCI in Delhi, said that it is time to unleash the economic potential of 50% of the population—namely women

Enterprise is not possible without empowerment. Empower women to promote enterprise among women, Narendra Modi, Gujarat chief minister said at the women’s wing AGM of FICCI in Delhi. He was clear in his focus on women as ‘Mother’ and also, ‘sister’, rather than any other role for unleashing women power. Our culture gives the highest status to mothers. The word ‘maa’ evokes reverence—that is our tradition. He pointed out that women today are two steps ahead of men and that we must all recognize that. He declared that wherever there is purity, mother is made the symbol and consequently, female foeticide is a matter of grave concern. The latter is present in society because education and modernity have made us more regressive on women’s issues.
Narendra Modi patiently educated the FICCI and television audience that women play an important role in society and that they have excelled whenever given an opportunity. The social imbalance in society must be corrected and it is time to unleash the economic potential of 50% of the population namely women. Even in the humble family set-up, Modi observed that he has seen sons disown their parents in old age, while he has seen daughters who have stood by their parents.
Modi peppered his speech with achievements of women entrepreneurs and women employees from Gujarat—the case of Lijjat papad, Jasubehn ka pizza, Indubai ka khakra, Amul. Jasubehn ka pizza in Gujarat gives Pizza Hut a run for its money... shows the power of women’s enterprise.
“We have to include women in decision-making process. Greater the role for women, better will be the implementation,” Narendra Modi said to the women in FICCI, who are themselves role models for younger women. Villages that elect all-women panchayats get special status and special grants in Gujarat. To admit a child in school, one must first record the mother’s name. There is no stamp duty for registering property in a woman’s name in Gujarat. Houses built by the government after the earthquake were handed over to women. Women enterprise along the Gujarat coastline includes seaweed cultivation which is hugely successful. Forest guards and tourist guides at Gir forest for lions include women. Modi summed it up as “There can be work for every woman... enterprise can reward each of them.”
The chief minister added that in the 19th century, a woman, Ganga Baa became a widow at 14. She started working. Mahatma Gandhi invited her to his Sabarmati Ashram. The Gandhi charkha we talk about was given to him by Ganga Baa. We have so many examples about women like that. Modi requested FICCI to constitute an editorial board to showcase Indian women entrepreneurs.




4 years ago

He should know. Look what the Famiglia did to him. Their Mantra is 2002. This obfuscates not just the 30,000 Sikhs they massacred in 1984 but also the lathi charges to uphold the right to rape following the murder of "Nirbhaya" and the murder of a peaceful middle aged lady, Raj Bhalla to uphold the right to corruption

Do IRDA health insurance guidelines really disallow claims settlement by TPAs?

While IRDA guidelines are clear that a TPA cannot settle or reject health insurance claims, the regulator seems to have made a last minute change related to a TPA’s function that was absent in the previous versions of the draft. Has it created a loophole to give TPAs a role due to pressure from insurance companies?

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) health insurance guidelines address several issues like lifelong renewals, special provisions for senior citizens, transparency in premium and claims based loading as well as excluding the role of third-party-administrators (TPAs) for claims settlement and rejections.  


It is a positive initiative to keep TPAs away from claims settlement or rejection due to numerous cases of inconsistencies in the payment amount as well as arbitrary rejections. But, has IRDA left a loophole that can be exploited by insurance companies working with TPAs? Did the regulator do it after feedback from insurers and TPAs? All government insurance companies use TPA services and many private ones, too.


IRDA’s health insurance guidelines state, “A TPA may handle claims admissions and recommend to the insurer for the payment of the claim settlement, provided a detailed guideline is prescribed by the insurer to the TPA for claims assessments and admissions.” It means a TPA will have a say in the amount that is to be paid for a claim or even recommend claim rejection to the insurance company. So, even though the insurance company will technically settle or reject the claim, the TPA will have major role to play in it. This will surely be exploited to its maximum by insurance companies and TPAs to meet their own needs.


On 11 January 2013, IRDA had written to CEOs of all insurance companies and TPAs stating that TPAs shall “only process claims and only the insurer shall have the right to settle or repudiate a claim.” These important wordings were omitted in the subsequent exposure draft sent by IRDA to the same stakeholders on 20 February 2013. The U-turn to allow TPA to recommend payment of claim may have been the outcome of feedback from insurance companies and TPAs.

The Insurance Act does not provide any role to the intermediary to settle or recommend claims. Interestingly, IRDA in response to a PIL (public interest litigation) filed by Gaurang Damani had stated, “The role of the TPA includes processing of the claims as per the policy documents issued by the insurer. But the onus lies on the insurer for settlement of claims.” At another time, IRDA in its own affidavit further stated that TPAs are intermediaries and not “Loss Assessors” or ‘Surveyors”. If so, why give TPAs the right to recommend the amount to be paid for a claim? Why has IRDA submitted different wordings to Bombay High Court and changed wordings in the health insurance guidelines?


How does this impact the Gaurang Damani PIL? As per the Bombay High Court directive at the last hearing on 2 April 2013, Gaurang Damani has submitted the additional affidavit in the court and the same has been served to IRDA on 4 April 2013 and to Union of India on 5 April 2013. It means that the fight continues.

The additional affidavit clearly states that “TPAs were not qualified in the field and they were acting arbitrarily to deny the rightful claim of the policyholders. As illustrated in the original petition Section III—Case Studies (Exhibits C-1 to C-11). It was been also found that TPAs were whimsically rejecting or reducing the claim amount without any cogent reasons.” It further adds that the gazetted regulations take away the right of claim settlement by the TPA (line 1 of Section 12(b)(1)), however TPAs have been given authority to recommend to the insurer for payment of claim settlement. This will defeat the purpose to be achieved by the petitioner by way of PIL filed in this matter.


The prayer in the additional affidavit states, “It is the petitioner’s humble prayer that clause 12(b)(i) of the gazetted regulations be immediately rectified in the spirit of the discussions held in the high court and also in reference to the documents submitted by Respondent No. 2 (IRDA) itself, to the high court. The words of the aforesaid clause ‘recommend to the Insurer for the payment of claim settlement’ should be removed at the earliest in the interest of justice, equity and fair-play.”



Baldev Raj Khanna

4 years ago

In October 2011, IRDA allowed portability for mediclaim policies. This was done by IRDA without studying the details of mediclaim insurance policies of all the companies. As per original mediclaim policy introduced, the sum insured was enhanced by 5 % for every claim free year subject to max. 50 %. But after detarffication, Oriental Insurance Co. changed this clause and instead started giving discount of 5 % of every claim free year subject to maximum of 25 %. Since portability is permitted, there is a big ambiguity in clauses. What steps IRDA is taking to remove this ambiguity. There is a basic anomaly and it should be curbedat an earliest. I fully agree with comment of Mr. Prabhat about claim sanctions.


4 years ago


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)