Moneylife » Personal Finance » Consumer Interest » Consumer Court asks British Airways to pay Rs36,000 to lady passenger
Consumer Court asks British Airways to pay Rs36,000 to lady passenger
British Airways denied the lady permission to take the flight to London, saying her onwards journey did not show as confirmed in their system, due to which the woman had to purchase fresh tickets at a higher price
New Delhi: For not allowing a woman to board its flight despite having a confirmed ticket, the British Airways has been asked by a consumer forum to pay over Rs36,000 as compensation to her for its 'deficient service', reports PTI.
The airline had denied her permission to take the flight to London, saying her onwards journey to Kansas, in the US from London did not show as confirmed in their system, due to which the woman had to purchase fresh tickets at a higher price.
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum observed that the airline should have allowed her to fly up to London by which time her onward journey status could have been confirmed, as according to the UK law a person not holding UK visa can remain in its airport for up to 24 hours.
"If the system of opposite party (British Airways) failed to show onward confirmed journey, they could have allowed her to travel up to London. The status could have been confirmed by the time she had reached London.
"Instead it did not allow her boarding under the pretext that the rules did not permit them to carry a passenger holding no visa for UK, but admit that they can do so as per law for 24 hours of such a passenger's arrival at London," the South West district forum said.
The forum's order came on the plea of New Delhi resident Puja Ahluwalia, who had alleged that the airline did not allow her to board its flight, on the night of 13 August 2008, from Delhi to London despite having a confirmed ticket.
The bench presided by Narendra Kumar held that by denying boarding pass to the woman the airline had been negligent and deficient in service and directed it to pay her Rs21,046 as difference of the price of the initial ticket purchased by her and the amount paid later for fresh tickets, along with Rs10,000 for harassment and Rs5,000 as litigation cost.
The British Airways in its defence had contended that the woman was denied a boarding pass as her onward travel was not confirmed and UK law forbade airlines from carrying passengers without valid Visa for UK or not having confirmed booking for onward journey within 24 hours on arrival at London.
More in Moneylife
PNB Metlife refunds Rs25,000 to the correct policyholder: another Moneylife victory +3334 views
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Post your Comment
| Alert me when new comment is posted on this article | |
| Please read our Moderation Policy and Terms of Use before posting | |
VIDEOS
Keep your Money Safe: Avoid money traps and MLM
LATEST COMMENT
I smell a fish in SEBI's Consent Order mechanism. It is an easy and inexpensive way out for those promoters and t.. sachchidanand
MORE
Bank depositors should be protected against inflation, demands AIBDA
Mastercard, Amex step up data sales to marketers, says ConsumerAffairs.com
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Take advantage of all our features and functionality exclusively designed for Moneylife.in members. Registration gives you easy access to - Moneylife Newsletters - Exclusive News - Special Features - Membership to Moneylife Foundation - Other Value adds And the registration to this website is completely free. Go ahead and submit this form to create your new profile. |
Tell us about yourself
I have read and agreed to the Terms & Conditions | |||||||||||||||||||
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low – I? Maximum buying at peak index levels
- Is the interest in Gold ETFs waning?
- Ashok Leyland: Sharply lower EBITDA margin is a matter of concern
- Income Tax dept slaps Rs557 crore notice on BPO firm WNS
- Cummins India’s guidance on the export business and sustainability of margins are key inputs for investors
- Competition Commission probing IATA for unfair practices
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–II? Momentum-chasing
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–III? Panic-selling during declines
- MMM India, another MLM taking people for “double-your-money” ride
- RBI tells HDFC Bank not to make up its own KYC verification rules
- Why I-T returns of Pawar, Jindal and Gandhi are exempted from RTI?
- How much longer can the FM, RBI ignore HSBC in India?
- Aadhaar: Private ownership of UID data- Part I
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Aadhaar: Who owns the UID database? –Part II
- Did HSBC Bank resort to toxic churning and illegitimate transactions to earn commissions?
- PNB Metlife refunds Rs25,000 to the correct policyholder: another Moneylife victory
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Goa’s Advocate General is the highest paid across the country, reveals RTI
- System glitch deducts 40% amount as TDS from SBI depositors’ account!
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low – I? Maximum buying at peak index levels
- Mass mis-selling: 59,000 investors in Kolhapur are alleged to have lost money in LIC ULIPs
- High Mark to sell 250 million records to another credit bureau?
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–II? Momentum-chasing
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–III? Panic-selling during declines
- Investors lost Rs1 lakh crore due to poor regulation. Will there be a CBI probe?
What's your say?
| Yes | |||||||
| No | |||||||
| Can't Say | |||||||
|
What you said
Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls
Join 22, 000 Others
Membership Benefits
- Daily & Weekly newsletters
- Access to www.moneylife.in to comment, create alerts
- Your own profile in Moneylife.in
- All special mailers
- Basic membership to MSSN, our new initiative
- Free ebooks
- Invitation to events
- Invitation to round-table meets
- Access to Insurance helpline
- Access to counselling sessions
- Access to Reading room in Mumbai
| Name: |
|
| Email: |
|
| Phone: |
|
| Catagory | |
| Message: |
|
| Enter Code: |
|





























