Citizens' Issues
Air passengers to pay more for baggage weighing over 15 kg

The move comes days after the Directorate General of Civil Aviation allowed airlines to charge fees for “unbundled services” like check-in baggage, preferential seats, meals, snacks or drink (barring drinking water) and sports and musical instruments on their domestic flights

 
Flying will become costlier from next week if you are carrying baggage weighing more than 15 kg with major airlines deciding to impose a levy of Rs250 per additional kg and considering charging more for preferential seating.
 
After Air India, private full service carrier Jet Airways on Thursday announced revision of free baggage allowance to 15 kg in economy class from 20 kg on its flights and that of its all economy arm Jet Konnect.
 
The new charge will come into effect from 15th May, Jet Airways said.
 
However, the JetPrivilege (JP) members would continue to enjoy the additional free baggage allowance as per their JP membership status, while Premiere (business class) guests would continue to avail 30 kg of free baggage allowance on Jet Airways and JetKonnect flights, it added.
 
The airline has left the permissible weight of cabin baggage to seven kg, as before.
 
The move came days after the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) allowed airlines to charge fees for “unbundled services” like check-in baggage, preferential seats, meals, snacks or drink (barring drinking water) and sports and musical instruments on their domestic flights.
 
Earlier, Air India had announced lowering of free baggage allowance from 20 to 15 kg on the domestic sector from 19th May.
 
The national carrier had on Monday last decided to charge a flat rate of about Rs200-Rs250 per kg on excess weight. The excess baggage charges beyond 20 kg currently vary between Rs150-Rs400 per kg depending upon the sector.
 
The airline is also contemplating levying charges for preferred seats like front rows, emergency exit seats, where leg space is more and window and aisle seats.
 
Meanwhile, low cost carrier IndiGo has decided to charge a premium from the fliers for pre-booking a preferential seat in domestic and international flights.
 
The airline would charge the passenger a premium of Rs500 for sitting in first two rows or near emergency exits in 12 and 13th row on a domestic flight and Rs800 for an international flight under its Indigo Seat Plus plan.
 
Though, IndiGo, has not indicated from when it would start charging the new rates, in a circular to travel agents it said for all other window and aisle seats, which are pre-selected, a passenger would be charged Rs200 for domestic and Rs300 for international flights.
 
While pre-booking of all other middle seats would cost Rs100 on a domestic and Rs200 on international flights.
 

User

COMMENTS

anantha ramdas

4 years ago

This unilateral increase by the airlines, aided by the Civil Aviation Ministry is against the interest of the travelling public.

What happens if the pax is going on a two day trip and carries cabin baggage (current free allowance is 7 kg) which is say 10 kg and no other check in baggage?

I have seen pax checking in (to the brim i.e. 20 kg+) still carry a cabin baggage plus computer. Neither the checkin clerk or the security stops them.


I do not know if we have a Passanger Association in operation and strong enough to lodge a protest by simply calling for a strike against such unfair practices. Hope some reader, who is a lawyer, can look up the law and prevent such move by the airlines!

arun adalja

4 years ago

this is nothing but making money in a different way and service nil.a person coming from abroad and going to native place by domestic flight must be exampted from this rule as foreing airlines allows 25 to 30 kgs.i think no clarifications on this issue.why different pricings?airlines changing price everyday and in some cases no refund.why such harassment?

Grey areas impacting prevention of money laundering in India

India is a heaven for black money and hawala transactions. However, we cannot afford to relax on this front. Need of the hour is to curb instances of money laundering to build a healthy financial system

 
The skeletons are coming out of the closet. A series of exposés by Cobrapost has made Indian financial institutions look extremely vulnerable to money laundering activities. Small, as well as large financial institutions look deficient in anti-money laundering policies that they are supposed to be strictly implemented and followed. Globally money laundering activities have been rampant. As per one estimate, the amount of money laundered globally in one year is 2%-5% of the global GDP, or $800-$2 trillion. There have been some instances of strict action on cases of money laundering, as well. HSBC was recently fined $1.9 billion for money laundering activity in its Mexico centre of operations.
 
On the contrary, very few cases of money laundering have been reported in India. This is in spite of the fact that India is a heaven for black money and hawala transactions. However, India cannot afford to relax on this front. The responsibility of adopting global standards of anti money laundering measures has increased ever since India became member of Financial Action Task Force (FATF). FATF has total 34 members. After having acquired a membership of FATF, India needs to follow 49 recommendations of FATF. Sadly, current exposures of Cobrapost show that we have failed to implement these recommendations in practice. Cobrapost revelations bring to the fore the areas that need special attention for the purpose of prevention of money laundering. Some of these are as follows:
 
Cash Transaction Report (CTR) threshold needs to be reviewed: The Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002, and rules there under require every banking company, financial institution and intermediary, to furnish to the FIU-IND (Financial Intelligence Unit-India) information relating to –
 
All cash transactions of the value of more than Rs10 lakh or its equivalent in foreign currency;
All series of cash transactions integrally connected to each other which have been valued below Rs10 lakh or its equivalent in foreign currency where such series of transactions have taken place within a month;
 
The threshold limit for a cash transaction report in the US is $10,000 and in Australia is A$10,000. In India, this limit should be less while actually it is Rs10 lakh and for series of connected transactions it can be less than Rs10 lakh. Why such a high threshold limit in India?  We all know that cash transactions are a preferred mode of moving black money in India. Also, cheque payments are avoided. For example in real estate transactions, black money is involved in a majority of transactions. Considering the spread of cash transactions, all transactions beyond Rs50,000 need to be reported as part of the cash transaction report, with or without suspicion. Just asking for PAN card is not good enough. Why can’t we make payments by cheques?
 
Customer document collection is not sufficient:   What is surprising is that in India, document collection at the time of account opening in not sufficient. Even essential documents are not collected at the time of account opening in all instances. While banks are supposed to comply with documentation in all cases, a KPMG study in this regard has found 13% accounts were opened without fully collecting or verifying documents, which all of us would agree that is a serious lapse (http://www.kpmg.com/IN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ThoughtLeadership/AML_Survey_2012.pdf). Even in cases where a document has been properly collected, customer due diligence was not done properly. Documents provided by customers have also been found to be fraudulent, in some cases.
 
Lack of customer data integration:  Many banks have data issues, because of which anti-money laundering becomes easier. For many banks, it is still not possible to integrate and arrive at complete transaction details of a single customer. For instance, if Mr X opens an account in Chennai and opens another account in New Delhi, many banks still cannot identify the money used by this customer across two branches within their own network. This creates space for money laundering in the banking system. 
 
Insufficient automation to handle politically exposed persons: KPMG had done a survey on anti money laundering (AML) in India in 2012. The survey brings out some of the series lacunae in the AML system in the country. For instance, as per FATF guidelines, financial institutions should have appropriate controls and checks to monitor politically exposed persons (PEP). FATF recommendations in this regard say that financial institutions should have:
 
Appropriate risk-management systems to determine whether the customer or the beneficial owner is a politically exposed person;
Obtain senior management approval for establishing (or continuing, for existing customers) such business relationships; 
Take reasonable measures to establish the source of wealth and source of funds; and
Conduct enhanced ongoing monitoring of the business relationship.
 
However, the result of the survey shows that more than 49% banks and financial institutions do not have automated system for checking PEP in India. This raises questions on the robustness of the AML system in banks.
 
 
Integrity Issues: This is probably the biggest challenge to handle. Connivance of employees in money laundering process can be reduced by better training and a strong deterrent like immediate punishment by the bank management. Every suspicious case of money laundering needs to be taken seriously and not wished away by the top management as has been the case during recent times. 
 
With rising incidents of corruption in India, cases of money laundering are bound to rise. Need of the hour is to curb instances of money laundering to build a healthy financial system.
 
(Vivek Sharma has worked for 17 years in the stock market, debt market and banking. He is a post graduate in Economics and MBA in Finance. He writes on personal finance and economics and is invited as an expert on personal finance shows.)

 

User

COMMENTS

keshav gupta

4 years ago

In our country there is no political will to stop black money.
Ordinary citizen who is having monthly income around 10000/- why will need Rs.500/1000/- currency note for payments.
Rs.500/1000/- note is only for settlement of transactions of illegal nature.
Make all deals/transactions with cash receipt/payments above Rs.10000/- as illegal.

REPLY

nagesh kini

In Reply to keshav gupta 4 years ago

ATMs dispense Rs.500 notes that need to be exchanged by a physical visit to bank branches.
In Mumbai the BEST conductors do not accept Rs. 500 notes.
Notes above Rs.500 need to be demonetised.

nagesh kini

4 years ago

KYC (Kick/Kill)Instead of Know your customer formalities are observed more in breach. How many bank branches have actually visited the residence to establish that the address is where s/he resides? Some private banks called on potenrtial at his/her with a photographer in tow. The Officer should affirm the home visit.
Yes the cash withdrawal limit has to be brought down to Rs.10,000 to be in line with the USA and Australia.
Each customer should be provided with a master ID for effective customer data integration,this needs to be verified at all branches where s/he opens new accounts to ensure PMLA compliance and Risk assessment.

NSriramamurty

4 years ago

In this week,in AP Cuddapah Police Changed a Car for a long Distance and Stopped. They Found Rs.30 lakhs Cash of Rs.500/1000 Notes.The owner said he took it Cuddapah to pay for a Land deal and it could not be struck and hence Bringing Back. As Correctly told by Author all property deals,including Bureucrates and Politicians, are done some Percentage Money Paying in cash, which is Black Money in Circulation.As there is no Co-ordination and Digital Reporting in all departments- No body can track and Interlink all such transactions.Surveys show that Registration Departments are highly Corrupt.As Cobrapost exposed, all Banks easily help all Illegal Transactions.

Watch out for those bright colours in your food; they are banned

Indian sweet makers go overboard with artificial colouring. Rhodamine B, followed by Orange II and Metanil Yellow, were the two most common non-permitted or banned colours that were used, according to a study by Sumita Dixit

 
A study, conducted on milk-based sweets consumed in India showed that nearly 60% of food colours used in Indian sweets are well above legal limits and as much as 16.4% are non-permitted colours.
 
A study by Sumita Dixit—a researcher at the Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Food, Drug and Chemical Toxicology Research Area (IITR)—published by the Journal of Food Science has come to the startling conclusion that Indian sweet makers go overboard with artificial colouring. While this is evident in the pink and green sweets, yellow and orange jelebis that we consumer with relish, there is not a scientific study that establishes the danger. Ms Dixit's study analyzed 2,409 samples of milk-based sweets, cereal-based sweets and savoury products. Of this sample, 83.6% contained permitted colours, but 58% of these were over the maximum allowable concentration limit of 100 mg/kg and the remaining 16.4% contained dangerous non-permitted colours. This has bought the total number of adulterated products in India to 64.8%.
 
The study showed that Rhodamine B, followed by Orange II and Metanil Yellow, were the two most common non-permitted or banned colours that were used. It is important to note that Rhodamine B is a cancer causing colouring agent that gives a pink colour but is actually meant for use in the plastics and textile industry. It gives a pink colour to sweets and is also used by shrimp paste makers to give it a fresh it a reddish brown hue. In many countries the use of Rhodamine B has been banned for 50 years and attracts a jail term, if used. Metanil yellow, which is widely used, is also banned and a study on rats showed that it affects the brain. 
 
Another research was conducted to assess how often Indian consumers ate colour-containing products at a national level. The study found that children and adolescents had higher average daily consumption of such foods than adults, potentially posing a health risk. The researchers said, “On the basis of average consumption of food commodities and average levels of detected colours, the intake of Sunset Yellow FCF saturates the acceptable daily intake limit to a maximum of 47.8% in children, which is a cause of concern”. Sunset Yellow has previously been linked to hyperactivity in children and Tartrazine, a lemon yellow colour, was the most common permitted colour. An earlier study found ADI limits were exceeded in 36% of food use in India.
 
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India permits eight synthetic colours in specified foods at a uniform level of 100 mg/kg, while the acceptable daily intake ADI for food colours varies from 0.1 to 25 mg/kg body weight per day. The researchers said that these rules needed to be reviewed. The rule relating to the uniform maximum permissible limit of synthetic colours should be governed by technological necessity and the consumption profiles of the food commodities, in order to prevent people from unnecessarily getting exposed to excessive amounts of synthetic colours which can risk their health. Also the saturation of ADI limits in the commodities which is up to 48% is a cause of concern.
 

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)