After two days of decline Sensex, Nifty may rise: Thursday Closing Report


If the Nifty manages to hold itself above Thursday’s lows we may see short rally 

Lower-than-expected economic indicators and a weak rupee led the market lower for the second consecutive day. While the market opened weak, the Nifty hit the day’s high towards the close of trade but the recovery lacked strength as the benchmark settled 27 points in the negative. If the index manages to hold itself above the day’s lows, we may see some reversal. The National Stock Exchange (NSE) saw huge volume of 90.92 crore shares on account of May F&O expiry.

A weak rupee, which tumbled to a fresh all-time low of 56.50 to a dollar and cautiousness ahead of the release of key economic indicators, saw the market opening lower. These apart, dismal global cues weighed on the sentiments. The Nifty opened 55 points down at 4,896 and the Sensex dropped 87 points to resume trade at 16,225.

The rupee tumbled by 26 paise to trade at a new all-time low of Rs56.50 against the dollar in early trade on increased capital outflows and strong demand from importers. On Wednesday, the rupee had lost 57 paise to close at record low of 56.24 despite the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) efforts to prop it up.

India’s fourth quarter gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 5.3%, which was the eighth successive decline and the slowest in the last nine years, pushed the market to its intraday low. At the lows, the Nifty fell to 4,884 and the Sensex dropped to 16,086.

A positive opening of the European benchmarks provided the local market the much-needed support, pushing the indices higher, albeit in the negative terrain. The benchmarks hit their intraday highs towards the close of the session. The Nifty rose to 4,949 at its high and the Sensex went up to 16,277.

Paring part of the gains, the market closed off the highs. The Nifty settled down 27 points at 4,924 and the Sensex lost 94 points to end the session at 16,219.

The advance-decline ratio on the NSE was negative at 614:804.

The broader markets were mixed as the BSE Mid-cap index gained 0.36% while the BSE Small-cap index declined 0.57%.

BSE Realty (up 1%); BSE IT (up 0.35%); BSE TECk (up 0.31%); BSE PSU (up 0.29%) and BSE Power (up 0.21%) were the top gainers in the sectoral space. The key losers were BSE Auto (down 1.96%); BSE Bankex (down 0.87%); BSE Consumer Durables (down 0.81%); BSE Capital Goods (down 0.70%) and BSE Metal (down 0.21%).

The main Sensex gainers were Hindalco Industries (up 2.06%); NTPC (up 1.28%); Hindustan Unilever (up 1.26%); Cipla (up 1.08%) and HDFC Bank (up 1.06%). The top losers were Tata Motors (down 4.17%); ICICI Bank (down 4%); Maruti Suzuki (down 3.86%); Jindal Steel (down 2.57%) and Sun Pharma (down 2.37%).

The Nifty was led by Jaiprakash Associates (up 3.66%); Asian Paints (up 3.50%); IDFC (up 3.37%); SAIL (up 2.55%) and Punjab National Bank (up 2.46%). Maruti Suzuki (down 4%); ICICI Bank (down 3.90%); Tata Motors (down 3.89%); Jindal Steel (down 2.71%) and Bank of Baroda (down 2.21%) settled at the bottom of the index.

Markets in Asia settled in the negative as Spain’s banking troubles led to speculations that the country may seek a bailout. Besides, Japan’s industrial production rose at a lower-than-expected pace of 0.2% in April from a 1.3% rise in March.

The Shanghai Composite declined 0.52%; the Hang Seng fell by 0.32%; the Jakarta Composite tanked 2.17%; the Nikkei 225 dropped 1.05%, the Straits Times fell by 0.41% and the KOSPI Composite shed 0.08%. On the other hand, the KLSE Composite gained 0.35% and the Taiwan Weighted climbed 0.55%.

At the time of writing, the key European indices were trading with gains of 0.24% to 0.73% and the US stock futures were in the positive.

Back home, institutional investors—foreign as well as domestic—were net sellers in the equities segment on Wednesday. While foreign institutional investors withdrew Rs10.74 crore, domestic institutional investors pulled out Rs182.61 crore.

Royal Dutch Shell and Reliance Power today announced plans to set up a floating liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal off the coast of Kakinada in Andhra Pradesh by 2014. The plan announced by the two companies in separate statements is the same as the one for which state-owned gas utility GAIL India had roped in French utility GDF Suez and signed pact with Andhra Pradesh government for a 3.5 million tonne floating LNG receipt facility. Reliance Power jumped 3.92% to settle at RS94.05 on the NSE.

Kolkata-based Tide Water Oil Co plans to take its newly acquired Veedol brand of lubricants to Germany this year. The company, which acquired Veedol International from British Petroleum in the last fiscal, has already set up Veedol International DMCC in Dubai to cater to the high-value West Asian market. The stock declined 2.66% to close at Rs6,820.05 on the NSE.

Wheels India has registered a 37.56% fall in net profit at Rs 7.05 crore for the quarter ended 31 March 2012 compared to Rs 11.29 crore during the same period of the previous fiscal. However, the total income increased 21.95% to at s 578.37 crore during the quarter under review, from Rs 474.26 crore for the corresponding period last year. The stock declined 3.48% to close at Rs728 on the NSE.



Economy & Nation Exclusive
India’s ‘shocking’ GDP growth may send shivers to coalition politicians

Credit Suisse, in its hard hitting analysis says that India’s GDP growth for the March quarter is much below expectations and coalition politicians may put more pressure on the RBI for easing rates

India’s gross domestic product (GDP) growth for the March quarter at 5.3% is well below the market expectations of 6.1% and softer than anything seen during the global financial crisis when GDP growth bottomed at 5.8%. “It is hard to describe India’s March quarter GDP release as anything other than shocking. It will inevitably send shivers down the spines of senior coalition politicians, who will no doubt be heaping pressure on the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to react and react aggressively,” says Credit Suisse in a report.

Robert Prior-Wandesforde, director, Asian economics at Credit Suisse, said, “We certainly believe the RBI should shift to a greater emphasis on growth, given the fact that economic growth leads inflation and is running well below everybody’s estimate of trend.  We also believe it will, with RBI governor D Subbarao able to point to the weakness of the RBI’s preferred measure of core inflation as evidence that underlying price pressures justify further monetary easing.”

With economic growth as weak as it is but headline inflation rates (both WPI and CPI) still troublingly high, the government also faces a dilemma—to raise or not to raise subsidised fuel prices.  “Our guess is that some adjustments to subsidised diesel, LPG and kerosene prices remain more likely than not (with petrol prices having already been hiked by about 11% last week) but by less than we previously thought.  The move may also be delayed by a month or two,” said Mr Prior-Wandesforde. 

According to Credit Suisse, the weakness of growth clearly bodes badly for the public finances but should improve the trade deficit. “Our suspicion is that the latter has been adversely impacted by the initial effects of the currency depreciation, which is to boost import prices and hence the value of imports.  Over time, however, the volume effects can be expected to dominate.  Indeed this is evident in today’s numbers with real export growth picking up to 18% year-on-year from 6% and import growth slowing sharply to 2% from 27%. We also expect tomorrow’s April trade release to show a substantial improvement,” the report said.

According to data from Thomson Reuters, India’s March quarter growth has been the slowest in the past nine years and well below analysts' forecast of 6.1%. The pervious low was in the fourth quarter of financial year 2002-03. For FY 2011-12 the GDP growth slipped to 6.50% from 8.50% the previous year. The growth for the year fell below the estimated of 6.90%. 

”The output breakdown of GDP showed widespread weakness with agricultural growth slowing to just 1.7% (from 2.7%), industrial growth down to 2.2% (from 2.6%) and services at 7.9% (from 8.9%). The last of these represents the biggest difference with the global financial crisis period when services growth remained above 9%. This in turn signals the more domestic nature of the current downturn,” says Prior-Wandesforde. 

Chandrajit Banerjee, director general, Confederation of Indian Industries (CII) said that the Q4 GDP figures have reconfirmed CII’s own estimates, which show that the economy is in the throes of a serious slowdown and is performing worse than perception. 

“With a huge fiscal deficit and a widening current account deficit, this calls for immediate and bold actions from the government and the RBI in a coordinated manner, which should be exclusively aimed at salvaging the economy. Repo rate and CRR cuts are called for as also measures from the government to kick start the investment cycle, since growth in capital formation has been negative for the last few months,” he said.





5 years ago

I don't think this will make any difference to the politicians. Even if it did, they wouldn't know what to do. Our Finance ministry and RBI bureaucrats have almost made a habit of acting against the interest of the economy. They should reduce interest rates further and ease availability of credit immediately, to give a boost to industry.

Personal Finance Exclusive
ICICI Pru Life slapped with highest-ever penalty of Rs1.18 crore

IRDA has imposed a record penalty of Rs1.18 crore on ICICI Pru Life for several serious violations including an unbelievable 11346% deviation in commission payable to India Infoline Insurance services in 2010-11

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has imposed a record fine of Rs1.18 crore on ICICI Prudential Life Insurance (ICICI Pru Life), the country’s largest private sector insurer. IRDA, which had conducted onsite inspection of the insurer between November and December 2010 found violations regarding corporate agency guidelines, paying more than the stipulated commission to its distributors (corporate agents, referral agents), not regulating corporate agents and making huge payments to brokers.

The regulator has termed “exceedingly serious violation” with stiff penalty of Rs40 lakh for huge deviation in commission to corporate agents like India Infoline Insurance Services, Nandi Financial Services, Netambit ValueFirst services, Soft Insurance Services, Fullerton India Credit, Yule Investments, Alacrity Financials and Sharekhan Financial Services. What is astonishing is a colossal deviation of 11346% and 1559% in commissions to India Infoline Insurance Services during the year 2010-11 and 2009-10 respectively.

ICICI Pru Life had created multiple code numbers for a single corporate agent and brokers based on the location of the business procured. The insurer had not put in place any mechanism to verify that the solicitation of business was done by a specified person or a qualified person respectively in relation to the number of locations or branches. The total penalty for these violations with respect to corporate agents like Bonanza Finproducts Distributors, Fullerton India Credit, Muthoot Wealth Management Services, Pioneer Assurance Consultants is Rs11 lakh.

ICICI Pru Life was remunerating the referral partners in the name of infrastructure support. The insurer was paying exclusive infrastructure fee (upfront) and costs towards space for insurance specialists, insurance corner space, advertising, etc. There have been violations in 20 instances and hence a penalty of Rs40 lakh.

Penalty of Rs20 lakh was imposed for huge deviation in commission to insurance brokers like Anand Rathi Insurance brokers, Bajaj Capital Insurance broking, Standard Composite Insurance brokers, Artha Insurance broking, KM Dastur Reinsurance broker and Edelweiss Insurance brokers. The highest deviation was for Standard Composite Insurance brokers of 402% in 2009-10. It was followed by Bajaj Capital Insurance broking with 152% deviation in commissions for the same year.

The insurer has entered into various agreements/MOUs with its group companies like ICICI Bank, ICICI Housing Finance Co, ICICI Securities, etc. for utilizing their network for marketing, advertisement and other services. These agreements are incomplete as they do not contain the detailed scope of services and the basis of payments for the said services. All these companies are also acting as “Corporate Agents/Referral partners” of the Insurer and are receiving due commission/referral fee. By this action, the insurer has violated clause 21 of Corporate Agency Guidelines. The insurer’s submission that these expenses are for various services like banking services, web promotional space, office space for employees of the insurer, other joint sales campaigns, etc, do not relate to garnering or procuring business, is not tenable and are in violation of the Insurance Act and Regulations cited. Heavy payments are paid towards marketing or logistic support and non-competing fee which are specifically against the provisions of the Act.




Krishna Gopal Gupta

5 years ago

This is another live illustration that MIS-SELLING is being made by corporate agents and bancassurance employees, which I have been saying from very beginning. Even insurance companies support them in view of large business from them intentionally and willingly. Even they had made special products for them to sell which are otherwise are not being offered through their own IFAs. IRDA also supports them to some extent by sleeping and not initiating any action on them for long long years. Still, insurance companies will learn nothing from it. Recently, one of my friend had bought a commercial property and he was short of funds of Rs 12 Lakh, which he tried to manage from a private financial institution. They agreed to it but with a condition to buy a single premium 12 Lakh term plan insurance for 15 years (term of repayment) at a premium which was approx. 30000/- more than the regular plan of the same company. But my friend has no choice so he succumbed to the pressure of private financial institute who happens to be a corporate agent of this ICICI Prudential Life Ins. Co. Ltd. as well. People will continue to suffer like this.

Deepak R Khemani

5 years ago

This penalty seems to be the highest which has been slapped on any company, but the list of violations is very large, if you go through the order there are a lot of violations which the company has committed but has been let off due to they being minor or first time violations.
It is good to see IRDA finally acting tough and as a regulator should.


5 years ago


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)