Moneylife » Personal Finance » Insurance » AEGON Religare: Kum Insurance Dene Ki Bimari?
AEGON Religare: Kum Insurance Dene Ki Bimari?
AEGON Religare has been cautioning the masses against ending up with a low insurance cover. But then why does it insist on selling you a lower insurance cover at a higher premium?
Pradip Kumar Paul, age 43, with an annual income of Rs5,10,024 made an online purchase of Rs50 lakh sum assured (SA) of AEGON Religare iTerm for policy term of 25 years, with a premium of Rs10,449 on April 5, 2012. After the medical test on 14th April, the customer was told that "The requested cover is not justified based on the income evidence supported" and they offered SA of Rs 30 lakh at premium of Rs9,876. Religare was actually asking Mr Paul to take a lower cover! Why is that ironic? Because AEGON Religare, of course, has had a long-running campaign trying to 'educate' the general public on the need to take sufficient insurance cover. The advertisement shows Bollywood star Irrfan Khan highlighting the fact that the Indian masses tend to take less life insurance cover than what they need. According to the ad, not taking sufficient life cover is a disease in itself or 'Kum Insurance lene ki bimari' or KILB. So why was Mr Paul offered kum insurance?
The reason was simple. AEGON Religare was keen to offer 40% lower insurance at almost same premium. It seems the insurer itself is suffering from a disease: KIDB (Kum Insurance dene ki bimari, the disease of giving less life cover).
Stumped by the fact that an insurance company that has been pushing you to buy a higher cover is asking him to take a lower one, Mr Paul asked a lot of hard questions about what is the salary level required for getting Rs50 lakh SA. AEGON Religare, then made a counter offer 28 April 2012 of Rs40 lakh SA at premium of whopping Rs12,494, which is Rs2,000 (or 20%) more than the premium for Rs50 lakh SA. How did Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) approve such a product feature?
Again, Mr Paul protested against the absurd offering and talked with the insurer over the phone. On 14 May 2012, he received email stating that Rs50 lakh SA can be offered only if he cancels an existing ICICI Pru Life term plan of Rs10 lakh SA expiring on July 2012. He argued that there is no point in cancelling before the date even though he will not renew the ICICI Life policy. AEGON Religare stated that they cannot hold the proposal till that time and hence either the customer pays additional premium for Rs40 SA or cancel his ICICI Pru Life policy to get refund after deduction of medical tests and other charges. Either way the customer is at loss. A classic approach from an insurer: either my way or highway.
The question is whether Mr Paul who earns Rs5.10 lakh per annum is entitled to Rs50 lakh SA from AEGON Religare and Rs10 lakh SA from ICICI Pru Life. The answer is an emphatically 'YyeEsS'. Financial planners talk about life insurance cover being of minimum 10-12 times the annual income. That means at least a total cover of Rs60 lakh. AEGON Religare seems to have their own way of deciding how much life cover the person should be entitled. The ad of course says that you should contact AEGON Religare to find out what is your 'right' insurance amount. Now we know the reason behind it. 'Right' insurance from AEGON Religare does not have to be the right insurance. Check its response - "AEGON Religare Life Insurance is not strict about offering a life cover. Depending on the eligibility of a customer, we offer the correct life cover that is 10 times the annual income in this case".
According to Aviva Life, “For a typical 35 year old with an annual income of Rs5 lakhs, he can opt for a Sum Assured up to Rs 1.1 cr (22 times of the annual income)”.
HDFC Life says, “For a Rs5 lacs salary income , a person can have ATLEAST 10 times coverage (Rs50 lakhs). However, the actual coverage will depend on his/her age and underwriting and previous coverage level”.
ARLI restricting the customer to maximum of 10 times annual salary is poor cover offering.
Mr Paul had declared his existing ICICI Pru Life term plan of Rs10 lakh SA while trying to buy the new plan. Why did AEGON Religare not stop the customer from buying a Rs50 lakh policy? Why was he made to go through medical tests and then bargaining of how much insurance cover he really needed? This leads to a crucial issue. Are the rates from online term insurance bait for customers? Is it less for selling and more for publicity? Many times the customer premium is hiked after medical test without giving the report. Companies have innovative ways of trapping the customer.
The most amazing aspect of the whole thing is, of course, pricing. The premium for Rs40 lakh SA is higher by 20% than the premium of Rs50 lakh SA! This cannot be justified by anyone, including IRDA. It beats the basic logic of risk pricing. According to AEGON Religare, "One needs to understand that an increased cover of insurance would make it difficult for the life assured to pay the life insurance premium. To mitigate that risk it is important to go for the correct amount of life cover". Did anyone tell them at AEGON Religare that its Rs40 lakh SA is 20% more expensive than Rs50 lakh SA in this case? They seemed to have missed the point.
More in Moneylife
Is the interest in Gold ETFs waning? +4174 views
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Post your Comment
| Alert me when new comment is posted on this article | |
| Please read our Moderation Policy and Terms of Use before posting | |
VIDEOS
Keep your Money Safe: Avoid money traps and MLM
LATEST COMMENT
MORE
Phaneesh Murthy saga: Why insurers should refuse to cover serial offenders of sexual harassment
Phaneesh Murthy iGate scandal: Time for Directors and Officers insurance?
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Take advantage of all our features and functionality exclusively designed for Moneylife.in members. Registration gives you easy access to - Moneylife Newsletters - Exclusive News - Special Features - Membership to Moneylife Foundation - Other Value adds And the registration to this website is completely free. Go ahead and submit this form to create your new profile. |
Tell us about yourself
I have read and agreed to the Terms & Conditions | |||||||||||||||||||
- Phaneesh Murthy: Let off by Infosys, sacked by iGate over sexual harassment charges
- Phaneesh Murthy saga: Why insurers should refuse to cover serial offenders of sexual harassment
- Why don’t funds promote trail commissions instead of upfront commissions?
- India’s current account deficit set to worsen again in Q2 2013, says Nomura
- Sensex Rally: Winners and Losers as the index challenges the high of 2010
- Govt approves restructuring of I-T dept; creates 20,751 posts
- Tata Steel reports consolidated loss of Rs6,528.51 crore loss in Q4
- US lauds India’s efforts to reduce oil imports from Iran; hints at new waiver
- Dish TV beats market expectations but ARPU remains subdued
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- How much longer can the FM, RBI ignore HSBC in India?
- Aadhaar: Private ownership of UID data- Part I
- Aadhaar: Who owns the UID database? –Part II
- Did HSBC Bank resort to toxic churning and illegitimate transactions to earn commissions?
- PNB Metlife refunds Rs25,000 to the correct policyholder: another Moneylife victory
- Cobrapost exposes money-laundering racket in 23 entities including SBI and LIC
- Do we need a regulator for ‘unclaimed’ deposits?
- Confusion between yield and rate of interest reflects financial illiteracy among business journalists
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Vinod Rai demits office: A CAG that India will miss
- Phaneesh Murthy saga: Why insurers should refuse to cover serial offenders of sexual harassment
- Sensex Rally: Winners and Losers as the index challenges the high of 2010
- Sunlight: The ‘be all and end all’ of human health
- Additional Home Secretary on the edge to complete probe into tampering of 26/11 call log records
- RTI exposes a revenue loss of Rs25,000 crore in Maharashtra
- Phaneesh Murthy: Let off by Infosys, sacked by iGate over sexual harassment charges
- Why re-examine the Gadgil Committee report on Western Ghats?
What's your say?
| Yes | |||||||
| No | |||||||
| Can't Say | |||||||
|
What you said
Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls
Join 22, 000 Others
Membership Benefits
- Daily & Weekly newsletters
- Access to www.moneylife.in to comment, create alerts
- Your own profile in Moneylife.in
- All special mailers
- Basic membership to MSSN, our new initiative
- Free ebooks
- Invitation to events
- Invitation to round-table meets
- Access to Insurance helpline
- Access to counselling sessions
- Access to Reading room in Mumbai
| Name: |
|
| Email: |
|
| Phone: |
|
| Catagory | |
| Message: |
|
| Enter Code: |
|






























Comment
uttam 3 months ago
Hi,
i have got a 75 lacs term insurance from hdfc click 2 protect.We insisted for medical strongly but the policy was approved without medicals.I am suspicious pls. help me if there is something fishy about it.
thanks,
uttam
Chiranjib 1 year ago
It is really confusing ! Should I go for pvt. Insurance co. with less premium or for LIC with more premium? Claim settlement ratio of LIC is still better. And Pvt insurers are cheating people with trivial matter.It is not fair on the part of Aegon to burgain with the customer regarding the amount of SA.Whatever max. SA is allowable as per IRDA’s rule with comparatively less premium should offer to the customer.This single case raises question regarding the business ethics of Aegon.
atmadeep 1 year ago
Thanks to ML to publish the artcle and experience of a customer.
We are really confused what to do? What is IRDA's stand in this regard? For settlement of the issue it is very much necessary.What did ultimately happen to him? Did he able to get the policy of his choice? Eager to know.Follow-up article Please.
Atmadeep 1 year ago
I read the article with utmost interest.It is really funny and surprising to know the unilateral decision of Aegon.What did happen to Mr. Paul? Did he able to get the policy at his choice?
It would be better if we know the IRDA's stand in this regard.
PC Bhandari 1 year ago
I bought an Aegon Religare policy in January 2010. The actual terms turned out to be far different to what I was told by the agent. But I learn that IRDA changed the rules only after mid 2010. So any one who bought such policies prior to mid 2010 has no recourse and has to put up with the one sided clauses and higher charges.
Can any one please guide on this subject ?
Thanks