Companies & Sectors
Adani Power owners to trim stake to meet free-float norms

As the promoters’ holding in Adani Power currently stands at 76.63% of which Adani Agro holds 3.13%, the proposed stake sale would bring promoters’ holding to 75%—in compliance with the SEBI requirement on minimum 25% free float for listed entities

 
Adani Power (APL) has intimated that Adani Agro Pvt Ltd (AAPL), part of the promoter group of APL, proposes to sell 35.58 million shares of APL (1.63% of the current shares outstanding of APL) on 8 October 2012.
 
The shares would be offered under Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) “Offer for Sale of Shares by Promoters through the Stock Exchange Mechanism”. It further said that the shares would be sold on a separate trading window of the BSE and the floor price for the sale would be declared post the stock market close on 5 October 2012.
 
As promoters’ holding in APL currently stands at 76.63% of which AAPL holds 3.13%, the proposed stake sale would bring promoters’ holding to 75%—in compliance with the SEBI requirement on minimum 25% free float for listed entities, which has to be met by June 2013. Nomura Equity Research’s interaction with the management of APL, post the stake sale announcement, confirms the reason for the same as “need to meet free-float norms”.
 
It may be noted that the promoters’ holding in APL stood at 73.5% until 23 May 2012 when the merger of two entities (Adishree Tradelinks Pvt Ltd and Sanidhya Commodities Pvt Ltd) with APL necessitated AAPL acquiring a 3.13% holding in the APL. Post the recently approved amalgamation of Growmore Trade & Investment Pvt Ltd (Mauritius) with APL takes effect, the promoter group’s holding in APL post the proposed stake sale by AAPL would drop to 68.3%.
 

User

Morgan Stanley: Time to ditch stock picking and switch to macro investing?

Morgan Stanley has come up with a quantitative ‘contrarian’ indicator to time stocks, based correlation between the “broad market” returns and the Sensex returns.

There are many styles and classes of investing. Depending on your personality, preference and skill set, you could either be a “bottoms-up investor” or a “top-down investor”. What is the difference between the two? In the former, also known as stock-picking, the process of investing starts at the bottom-most level or the stock itself. You start off by choosing a company, any company, and analysing it using fundamental yardsticks. On the other hand, top-down investing one starts from the ‘top’. For example, you analyse the economic climate, select what which sectors are doing well, then select few stocks from the specific sector. In both methods, fundamental analysis is used.
 

The Asian division of Morgan Stanley Research has advocated, in its latest research report titled “The Best for Stock Picking Is Over”, macro approach to investing rather than bottoms-up style of stock picking. The report said, “Since their peak in January 2012, correlations have declined, but not to levels that historically have signified an opportunity to open up sector positions. In short, we are somewhere between the macro and micro trade but no longer firmly in stock-picking territory.”
 

The truth is that stock picking, or bottoms-up investing, always work, and always will, if the investor is willing to put in the hard work and effort to identifying key stocks (witness for example the performance of stocks recommended in Street Beat section of Moneylife: Wim Plast: Outstanding performer;Narmada Gelatines: Superior products;Unquoted-Stories of Price Manipulation: E.Com Infotech;Steady Performance). Despite this, purely quantitative methods of beating the market have been in the vogue of late. It requires significantly less effort in selecting stocks and more effort in creating a formula which can be automated. As the investment landscape has changed rapidly, the need to pick stocks quicker than the rest and make quick money, often over the short-term rather than long-term, becomes important. In the old days, all one needed was an annual report. Now, a computer is required to run quantitative calculations. However, sometimes, like stock picking, if quantitative method can be applied correctly by the investor, it can work.
 

In this case, Morgan Stanley has used a quantitative tool using correlation to determine which sectors are worthwhile. Sometimes, investors like to go ‘contrarian’ or against the crowd. For instance, if the crowd is buying, then some would like to sell and vice versa. It is more of a psychological indicator rather than a fundamental one. This trait is more developed through experience rather than algorithms and mathematical formulae. Morgan Stanley Research has come up with a quantitative ‘contrarian’ indicator to time stocks, based on correlation. When correlation between the “broad market” returns and the Sensex returns are high, it is time to do stock picking and vice versa. At the moment, the correlations are low, and therefore ripe for going macro. In other words, the Sensex, which contains only 30 stocks, and the broader market, which consists of hundreds of stocks, exhibit almost the same returns, and therefore there is not much of a case for going into the nitty gritty details of stock picking which requires hard work. 
 

Further, the report said, “When the correlations are high and rising (as has been the case for most 2011 and 2012), it means the macro has wielded undue influence on stocks. Our strategy is to do the opposite, because we argue that at any point in time there are always individual factors driving stock returns. The opposite holds true as well. Hence, when correlations are low, macro influence is absent, and the market is overly focused on idiosyncratic stock factors—to us, this is the time to get macro.”
 

However, the levels aren’t extreme enough to be a total contrarian (i.e. go full macro or sector-wide investing rather than individual stock picking). It is somewhere between stock picking territory and macro-investing territory. If it is somewhere ‘between’ stock-picking territory and macro-investing territory, then surely there are opportunities to indulge in stock picking.
 

All this observations might stump most investors who are into stock picking because there’s always an opportunity lurking everywhere, whether it is to go long or short a particular stock. Having said this, it still believes that stock picking is ripe in some sectors but stopped shy of mentioning the specific stocks to invest. It believes financials, utilities, industrials and materials will offer bottoms-up stock picking opportunities. The report said, “Correlations seem high in utilities, financials, industrials and materials. These sectors are more amenable to stock selection. We are neutral in these sectors, except for materials.”

User

SBT lowers BPLR by 0.25% to 15.25%

State Bank of Travancore reduced its BPLR by 0.25% to 15.25% from 8th October

 
Mumbai: State Bank of Travancore (SBT) has lowered its benchmark prime lending rate (BPLR) by 0.25% with effect from 8th October.
 
The bank has lowered the BPLR to 15.25% from 15.50% at present, SBT said in a BSE filing.
 
However, the base rate will remain at 10.50%, same as the existing rate.
 
The revised rate will be effective from 8th October, it said.
 

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)