Citizens' Issues
Ad agencies and TV channels wake up to the truth about television ratings

For years NDTV’s accusation that TAM’s audience ratings are rigged, had no takers. So, why is its lawsuit against TAM being taken so seriously now?

 
NDTV bells the cat” on TAM ratings, says a Business Today report, quite correctly, about the “problem that has festered between Television Audience Measurement (TAM) ratings and television channels for more than a decade”. The magazine, which is part of a group that also runs popular television channels, goes on to call it a “ticking time bomb”.
 
Great; but why then is the industry waking up to the seriousness of the rating problem only after NDTV filed a $1.3 billion lawsuit? After all, NDTV has been banging on about TAM ratings since 2004 and has even conducted a well-publicised sting to back up its charges (even while most of its advertisements claimed it was numero uno). I also have it from a senior NDTV insider that they did attempt to get other broadcasters to join their lawsuit, but had to go alone when they failed to get any support. 
 
What the industry clearly didn’t reckon with is NDTV’s phenomenal clout with the Congress-led government. As soon as news about the lawsuit became public, the government and its powerful ministry, which was in slumber until then got hyperactive. Consider the initial reaction. 
 
When the news about the $1.3 billion suit against TAM hit the newswires, there were plenty of sniggers. The ex-chief of a multinational company dripping with sarcasm said, “NDTV should complain about Arnab Goswami stealing their lunch (anchor of Times Now) not TAM”. A committee on false advertising that I am a part of maintained a studious silence when I sought a reaction to the lawsuit. But everybody started singing a different tune just two days later. “I have always been saying that the TAM data is all wrong, fudged” said Zee group founder Subhash Chandra. The CEO of Zee Networks says, “It is clearly emerging that we were provided research data that was questionable”. But that’s not news, is it? Well, the CEO of Sony claims “the rot” has been noticed only now, not in 2004. (quotes have been picked from various media). Why?
 
Remember, TAM is the only audience measurement system available in India today. So our question remains—why didn’t those who had suspicions or issues with TAM ratings join NDTV’s lawsuit? In fact, if there had been collective action, a lawsuit would not even have been necessary. As Sherlock Holmes said about the dog that didn’t bark… those who didn’t complain had figured out a way to work with the system. And, as I always say, there is nothing more democratic than corrupt person or organisation. All you need to do is to pay for what you want, or pay more than the next guy. In fact, when NDTV first complained, most advertising industry associations had rooted for TAM and backed its ratings. 
 
Why then the sudden rush to discredit TAM after the NDTV lawsuit? In fact, if NDTV simply collates all news reports basing TAM ratings after its lawsuit became public, it could probably collect a billion dollars as an out-of-court settlement from the powerful WPP-Nielsen-VNU-Nielsen-Kantar-JWT India-IMRB-TAM group who have been made party to the suit. 
 
Were broadcasters scared of WPP’s clout to dictate where the advertising rupee goes? Probably. But then, how did WPP’s clout (it owns a string of the largest advertising, rating and media agencies in the world and in India) suddenly diminish when a struggling broadcaster like NDTV decided to sue? Obviously because of signals from the government. 
NDTV’s formidable clout with the government has ensured that the ministry of broadcasting has remembered that its own National Media Policy report (by the Sectoral Innovation Council) had called for an alternative to TAM. The information & broadcasting ministry has asked the Indian Broadcasting Foundation, Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI) and Indian Society of Advertisers “to speed up the process” of getting the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) operational. BARC was expected to be operational by July 2013, but seems nowhere near meeting that target. In fact the broadcasters association is blaming advertisers associations for slowing down the formation of BARC. And the advertisers are silent. 
 
All this is ironic, because TAM’ s systems allegedly remained untouched by the government because of powerful politicians across party lines who own large chunks of the broadcast media. 
 
NDTV’s charge is that TAM’s sample size for deciding audience preferences is too small. Of the 148 million television-owning homes (126 million have cable) the sample for deciding how the advertising megabucks are spent is a mere 8,000. Just too easy to manipulate! The way TAM works is to have a data-box installed in televisions for the homes that are part of the sample. The way to manipulate the data is to bribe the persons in the sample to tune in to specific programmes or to bribe the TAM employees. Rumour has it that both types of bribes and manipulation were rampant—after all, it is not difficult to reach just enough households to skew the data. 
 
At the least, NDTV wants TAM to stop publishing its corrupted data. TAM is refusing to speak on the issue, but the powerful media group is working overtime to defuse the situation.  As things stands, reactions to the lawsuit suggest that the advertising industry and media agencies had collectively underestimated NDTV’s clout. On the other hand, when it comes to genuine viewership, no clout can prevent you and me, the viewers, from reaching for the remote if the content does not interest us. Also, we don’t really need TAM to tell us that NDTV’s viewership and credibility had been hit by many factors. In fact, industry and investment experts invariably point out that the advertising and sponsorship that NDTV commands is completely out of whack with its perceived viewership—whether or not it is measured by a formal rating system. The same is true about its ability to find a series of marquee investors willing to buy its shares at a fancy premium even when its financial performance is terrible. 
 
It’s a strange situation. Almost everybody thinks NDTV gets far more advertising than it deserves; but it now had a chance of working a deal that will give it better ratings or a nice settlement. It remains to be seen what other broadcasters, with lesser political clout will do.
 

User

COMMENTS

MOHAN SIROYA

4 years ago

IM GLAD THAT MEDIA IS AWAKENING NOW ON THIS.
I had written about the 'Sham' and 'Fudged' TAM rating in my print mag "SHADOW PLAY" as back as in April 2001 .
Other media is awakening only today. Khair, 'Der Aayad ,Durust Aayad'.

Mohan Siroya

REPLY

MOHAN SIROYA

In Reply to MOHAN SIROYA 4 years ago

Sucheta Ji
If U so desire, I can send U a scanned clipping of that 'analytical comment' of April 2001 .
Thanks and Regards

Mohan Siroya

Ravindra

4 years ago

Income tax dept must quickly raid the houses of the TAM executives to unearth the bribes (off course in cash, not by cheques) to ascertain the truth.
Instead of bothering the common tax paying citizens, IT Dept must concentrate on these type of sources.

PATTABHI

4 years ago

"Physician, Heal Thyself" is the message to the self-righteous Media people ..

Thackeray criticises Advani for 'demoralising' blog

Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray said if LK Advani has any doubts, he can come to Matoshree to get a dose of ‘moral’ and ‘strength’ from him

 
Mumbai: Slamming Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) leader Lal Krishna (LK) Advani for predicting a non-BJP, non-Congress Prime Minister in 2014, Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray on Tuesday said it is like a general saying before a war that there is no guarantee on the outcome and 'demoralising' the entire army, reports PTI.
 
"What has happened to our ally BJP. Has it been afflicted with an illness or has it been beset with internal squabbles," Thackeray said in an editorial in party mouthpiece 'Saamana' on Tuesday.
 
Advani's musings were demoralising, Thackeray said and asked NDA "not to lose heart".
 
"If Advani has any doubts, he can come to me and I will give him a dose of morale and strength," Thackeray said commenting on his blog where the BJP leader predicted a non-Congress, non-NDA alliance coming to power.
 
"This is like a general saying before a war that there is no guarantee on the outcome, and demoralising the entire army," Thackeray said.
 
He asked the NDA to prepare for the general elections with renewed vigour.
 
The issue of contenders for the Prime Minister's post within the NDA -- Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi -- could be sorted out after the elections, he said.
 
Writing in his blog, Advani had ruled out formation of a government headed by the Third Front but said that a non- Congress, non-BJP Prime Minister heading a government supported by one of these two parties is possible.
 
"The blog has put BJP in a quandary," Thackeray said.
 
Thackeray said the next Prime Minister should be from the NDA and that decision could be taken after polls are over.
 
"No point conceding defeat now, without even entering the boxing ring.
 
"Even Advani himself has been a Prime Ministerial contender over the years and if there is consensus, his wish can also be fulfilled," Thackeray said.
 
The blog would add fuel ambitions in Nitish Kumar and Narendra Modi for the prime minister's post, he said.
 
Shiv Sena would play "free-style wrestling" in attempting to overthrow Congress from power, Thackeray said.
 
The saffron flag will fly atop Delhi's Red Fort in 2014 polls, he said.
 

User

COMMENTS

Dayananda Kamath k

4 years ago

people of india are lucky that they have not voted bjpin 2009 otherwise we would have onemore primeminister who do not belive in his own parties strength. it is a tragidy of india that congress promotes inefficient and other great opposition party bjp drags down the efficient in the party.both ways india is the looser. and all the other parties enjoying blackmailing the party who matters to rake in the moola again it is india is the looser.

MOHAN

4 years ago

.

Mr. Advani is right. The person he is hinting at is none other than Dr. Subramanyam Swami.

Fraud Allegation: Is Deccan Chronicle another satyam?

 The company has blamed its problems on a liquidity crunch because of a sharp decline in ad...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)