Nifty may move in the range of 4,935 and 5,125
Weak global cues and poor quarterly results from domestic companies resulted in the market snapping its three-day winning streak. The Sensex and the Nifty saw their steepest one-day fall of 2.15% and 2.26% since 16 December 2011 and 8 December 2011, respectively. The fall on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) was on a high volume of 75.59 crore shares. We had mentioned in our Friday’s closing report that the Nifty would move in the range of 5,090 and 5,250, however, it breached the lower range and closed below it. If the Nifty breaks today’s low of 5,077, we may see it moving in the range of 4,935 and 5,125 with a downward bias.
Snapping its three-day winning streak, the domestic market opened lower tracking the Asian bourses which were mostly lower on unending Eurozone debt concerns. Fitch Ratings on Friday downgraded the sovereign credit ratings of Italy, Spain Belgium, Cyprus and Slovenia, indicating there is a one-in-two chance of further downgrades in the next two years. The inability of Greece and its private creditors to come to a consensus on debt swap talks also weighed on the investors.
The Nifty opened at 5,164, down 41 points from its previous close, and the Sensex resumed trade with a cut of 96 points at 17,138. The Nifty touched an intraday high of 5,166 in early trade while the opening figure was the high on the Sensex was its high.
Dismal quarterly performance of blue-chips like NTPC and BHEL resulted in a sell-off in the capital goods and power sectors. Banking stocks were also under pressure in trade today.
The market drifted lower in noon trade on a lower opening of the European markets ahead of a meeting of European leaders to chalk out a plan to resolve the debt crisis.
The benchmarks fell to their intraday lows towards the close of trade wherein the Nifty dropped to 5,077 and the Sensex went back to 16,828. The market closed marginally higher, but with a loss of over 2%. The Nifty settled 117 points down at 5,087 while the Sensex tumbled 371 points to 16,863.
The advance-decline ratio on the NSE was negative at 546:1237.
While the broader indices also ended lower, they outperformed the Sensex. The BSE Mid-cap index closed 1.96% lower and the BSE Small-cap index declined 1.82%.
Today’s rout saw all sectoral indices settling in the red. The losers were led by BSE Capital Goods (down 5.55%); BSE Power (down 3.54%); BSE Realty (down 3.10%); BSE Metal (down 2.85%) and BSE Bankex (down 2.78%).
Sun Pharma (up 1.34%); Bajaj Auto (up 0.48%); Jindal Steel (up 0.41%); Hero MotoCorp (up 0.13%) and TCS (up 0.06%) managed to settle higher on the Sensex. The top losers were BHEL (down 10.41%); Sterlite Industries (down 5.99%); Larsen & Toubro (down 5.37%); Hindalco Industries (down 4.81%) and Mahindra & Mahindra (down 4.71%).
The Nifty gainers were led by Sun Pharma (up 1.48%); Ranbaxy Laboratories (up 1.18%); Bajaj Auto (up 0.80%); Jindal Steel (up 0.70%) and Grasim (up 0.40%). The top laggards were BHEL (down 11.33%); Sterlite Ind (down 7%); Sesa Goa (down 6.96%); JP Associates (down 6.57%) and L&T (down 5.75%).
Markets in Asia closed mostly lower on fresh concerns about Europe. The failure of the Greek government and its private creditors to sew an agreement and cautiousness ahead of a crucial European leaders’ summit weighed on the markets.
The Shanghai Composite declined 1.47%; the Hang Seng dropped 1.66%; the Jakarta Composite tumbled 1.79%; the KLSE Composite fell by 0.48%; the Nikkei 225 lost 0.54%; the Straits Times declined 0.96% and the Seoul Composite settled 1.24% lower. Bucking the trend, the Taiwan Weighted jumped 2.40%.
Back home, foreign institutional investors were net buyers of stocks totalling Rs1,240.16 crore on Friday. On the other hand, domestic institutional investors were net sellers of equities amounting to Rs708.46 crore.
Infrastructure major IVRCL today said it has bagged a Rs1,300 crore project from the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) for widening the Raipur-Bilaspur road stretch in Chhattisgarh. The project is to be executed as a BOT (Toll) project on a design, build, finance, operate and transfer pattern under NHDP-IV, the company said. The stock tumbled 7.68% to Rs45.70 on the NSE.
Bhushan Steel today said it plans to raise up to Rs700 crore by April through a rights issue to part-finance its ongoing expansion projects. The money will be utilised to part-finance the company’s expansion activities, particularly in Odisha, where it is setting up a 3 million tonnes per annum plant. The stock declined 2.93% to close at Rs339.50 on the NSE.
Electrical equipment maker Havell’s India has reported a 41.27% jump in its consolidated net profit for the quarter ended 31 December 2011 at Rs89 crore, up from Rs63 crore in the year-ago period, boosted by healthy performance across all segments of its business.
During the quarter, consolidated net revenue grew 16.41% to Rs1,660 crore from Rs1,426 crore in the year-ago period. The stock gained 3.58% to close at Rs444.30 crore on the NSE.
Spectrum sharing was expected to be part of the National Telecom Policy-2011 and the operators were looking forward to it, but the government’s decision not to allow this may impact their business plans
New Delhi: After their third generation (3G) roaming agreements being termed as ‘illegal’ by the Department of Telecom (DoT), telecom firms may be in for another shock now with the government deciding against allowing spectrum sharing in this segment, reports PTI.
Spectrum sharing was expected to be part of the National Telecom Policy-2011 and the operators were looking forward to it, but the government’s decision not to allow this may impact their business plans, sources in the know said.
Although no specific reason was given for not allowing sharing of spectrum, sources said this may be allowed in case of two operators having similar frequency bands.
“Spectrum sharing will not be permitted among licencees having 3G spectrum (in the same circle),” according to the sources.
The Department of Telecom (DoT) has already termed the 3G roaming agreements among various operators as ‘illegal’.
The Telecom Dispute Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) is already hearing the dispute on this.
Private operators—Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Essar, Idea Cellular, Aircel and Tata Teleservices—have also filed a caveat in both the Supreme Court as well as the high court apprehending that the government may appeal against the TDSAT order which dismissed DoT's plea that the telecom tribunal has no jurisdiction over the intra-circle 3G roaming pacts.
Earlier, the telecom tribunal TDSAT had dismissed the government’s plea challenging its jurisdiction to decide on 3G roaming dispute, but directed operators to submit copies of their agreements to DoT.
The tribunal also directed five operators to hand over copies of their 3G roaming agreements to the DoT. It also said that DoT, as per its earlier statement, would maintain confidentiality of the agreements.
DoT had questioned the jurisdiction of TDSAT saying that the tribunal has no power to look into the licence terms and conditions entered among the operators and the DoT.
The TDSAT had also given a lifeline to private telecom operators by extending its interim order that restrained DoT from taking any coercive action against them.
Last year, passing an order on 24th December, the tribunal had directed the DoT not to take any coercive action against telecom operators.
A day prior to that the government had asked the five telecom operators to stop their inter-circle roaming on 3G bandwidth within 24 hours and it was challenged by Airtel, Vodafone, Idea, Aircel and Tata Tele before TDSAT.
Even as India bans pyramid schemes under a statute called the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, the country continues to be a happy hunting ground for pyramids because our legislation is deliberately unworkable
Each pyramid or a multi-level marketing (MLM) company has typical business plan. Get more into their scheme/plan and earn commission on it. The level of income, commission, attached to recruitment, rises as new members pour in. However, this technique, experts say is bound to collapse the plan, as it is mathematically unsustainable.
According to the Robert Fitzpatrick co-author of the book, False Profits, the first book-length analysis of pyramid schemes and multi-level marketing, such MLM enrolment technique is the root cause of the failure of these schemes.
On his blog, titled, “This is Not a Pyramid”, (http://www.falseprofits.com/files/6b364baa6fc2093ce159e272bbc423e5-34.html) he has presented a satirical explanation on the typical MLM enrolment plan. “Each one, just like you, gets the right to recruit as many as they can, and every time the person they sign up as a salesperson makes a purchase, they get paid, just like you do, on your recruits’ purchases. But, here’s the kicker! You’ll get a payment on the purchases of their recruits? Think about that! If you sign up five new salespeople and they each do the same, you have 25 more salespeople working for you, a total of 30.
Remember, you didn’t get money from the sign-up fees, only on the purchases made after the sign up fees are paid, and you didn’t get paid to recruit, but you got paid because you recruited. Is that perfectly clear?”
He adds, “When their recruits (the 25 additional salespeople) each recruit five more, you’ll get paid on their purchases to! That’s 125 more! Now, you’ve got155 salespeople, each one making purchases and you’re getting a commission from every one of them. How’s that sound? All you need to do is find five new salespeople.”
However, Mr FitzPatrick explains that, “it is obvious no one will actually make the promised profits, unless they recruit others to invest as ‘salespeople’ and the newly recruited salespeople, in turn, would have to do the same, ad infinitum. The presenter makes it obvious that it's all about recruiting, even as he insists it all about sales. (No one is ever paid to recruit!) Compounding rewards from recruiting are promoted as the main attraction of the scheme's ‘unique’ compensation plan.”
Generally, such plans are divided in two categories—pyramid and MLM schemes.
Both have certain difference with pyramids being pure fraud. Their business is unsustainable—they promise payment for goods or services of dubious value. Often the products are notional, something like SpeakAsia, which claimed to sell e-zines (online magazines). MLMs claim to be serious businesses and have a product to sell. For instance, Amway, Tupperware, Herbalife, etc.
In case of MLMs, often people give up on selling the product. According to False Profits, 50-70% of the ‘distributors’ (members) quit in the first year and less than 1% of make money.
Take the case of Vivek Kumar (name changed) an engineering student, who in the lure of earning extra money invested in one such MLM scheme selling personal care products. Soon, he was unable to convince anyone to buy or invest. He eventually stopped chasing people and neither was his principal recovered, nor were the products sold.
More importantly, since most sensible countries have placed outright bans on pyramid marketing schemes, they tend to disguise their true nature by pretending to sell a product or a service, often of doubtful value. Most MLMs have attracted lawsuits due to high start-up costs, tiered sales and exploitation of personal relationships and cult-like sales techniques.
According to False Profits, the US courts often use the 70% test to analyze if the plan, based on building a downline, is legal or illegal. The test says that all the MLM must derive at least 70% of its income from retail sales to non-distributors. “If less than 70% of income comes from sales to these non-distributors, the courts have concluded the MLM company is in the business of endlessly recruiting distributors who recruit distributors. In short, they are pyramid schemes, not sales and distribution companies.”
But Mr Fitzpatrick says that even if the plans pass 70%, which also used by the Federal State Commission (FTC) test, the salespersons would still lose their money. “This is because a pyramid scheme is inherently deceptive and harmful. The fraud is in the design and the pay plan. Regardless of the minimal retailing that occurs per salesperson, under the scheme's compensation plan, recruiting a downline is still needed to recoup expenses.”
He adds, “By a pyramid's design, only a small minority can be in the upper ranks and have an adequate downline to achieve profitability. All the others are that downline! Like all MLMs, this scheme pays the recruiters more in commission, per sales of the entire downline, as their downline grows through recruiting.”
Interestingly, even as India bans pyramid schemes under a statute called the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, the country continues to be a happy hunting ground for pyramids because our legislation is deliberately unworkable.